Enforcing jurisdiction
Finland · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

LähiTapiola Keskinäinen Henkivakuutusyhtiö – Court Ruling (Finland, 2024)

Court Ruling
DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu16 January 2024Finland
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Administrative Court of Helsinki ruled that LähiTapiola Keskinäinen Henkivakuutusyhtiö could not process health data of life insurance applicants without a valid legal basis. This decision emphasizes that companies must have clear reasons for handling sensitive personal data. It affects how insurance companies assess risks related to applicants.

What happened

The court decided that LähiTapiola had no legal basis to process health data of life insurance applicants.

Who was affected

Life insurance applicants whose health data was processed by LähiTapiola without proper justification.

What the authority found

The court found that the Finnish Data Protection Act does not allow insurance companies to consider applicants as insured parties before a contract is concluded.

Why this matters

This ruling reinforces the need for insurance companies to ensure they have a valid legal basis for processing sensitive data. It serves as a reminder for businesses to carefully evaluate their data processing practices.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 9 GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 9(1) GDPR
Art. 25(2) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 9(GDPR)
Art. 9(1) GDPR
Art. 25(2) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 2(1)(5) Insurance Contracts Act
§ 44(1)(3) Administrative Procedure Act
§ 6(1)(1) Data Protection Act
Decision AuthorityHelsingin hallinto-oikeus
Reviewed AuthorityTietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland)

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller (LähiTapiola Keskinäinen Henkivakuutusyhtiö, a life insurance company) had asked the Administrative Court of Helsinki (the Court) to overturn the Finnish DPA's decision, according to which the controller had no legal basis to process the health data of life insurance applicants and it processed the data unnecessarily. The controller filed the appeal claiming that it must be able to process health data, because the health status of the insured party and the risks associated with it are at the centre of the risk assessment related to the granting of the insurance. The controller considered that insurance applicants must also be considered insured parties in accordance with [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2018/20181050#L2P6 Section 6(1)(1) of the Finnish Data Protection Act], according to which insurance institutions may, despite the general prohibition in Article 9(1) GDPR, process the health data of the insured party and the claimant, which is necessary to determine the liability of the insurance institution. The controller also stated that the order issued by the DPA, on the basis of which it should assess the time period for which it is necessary to request health data, is vague and unspecified. The controller considered that it must be able to process all health data in order to assess which precise information is ultimately relevant. The Court noted that neither the Finnish Data Protection Act nor its preparatory material have defined what is meant by the insured party in connection with the application of the Act. However, in the Court's view, the preparatory material of the Act does not support as an interpretation that the legislator intended to extend the concept of "insured party" to apply also to the applicant an insurance before the conclusion of an insurance contract. In this respect, the Court also stated that the "insured party" is defined in [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1994/19940543#L1P2 Section 2(1)(5) of the Finni

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Details

Ruling Date

16 January 2024

Authority

DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. LähiTapiola Keskinäinen Henkivakuutusyhtiö - Finland (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: