SPARTOO SAS – €250,000 Fine (France, 2020)

€250,000Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés28 July 2020France
final
ePrivacy
Fine

SPARTOO SAS was fined €250,000 for not properly handling customer data, specifically regarding data retention and minimization. This case serves as a reminder for online businesses to ensure they manage customer data responsibly and in line with legal requirements.

What happened

SPARTOO SAS failed to comply with data retention and minimization rules, leading to a significant fine.

Who was affected

Customers of SPARTOO SAS whose data was not managed according to legal standards were affected by this violation.

What the authority found

The French data protection authority ruled that SPARTOO SAS violated multiple GDPR articles related to data handling, resulting in a €250,000 fine.

Why this matters

This case highlights the need for businesses to implement strict data management practices. Companies should regularly review their data retention policies to avoid costly penalties.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 32(1) GDPR
Art. 56(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 32(1) GDPR
Art. 56(1) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Source verified 2 April 2026
articles corrected
scope corrected
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 31 May 2018, CNIL initiated an investigation in the premises of SPARTOO SAS in order to investigate whether the processing of the personal data of its clients, prospect clients and employees, are compliant with GDPR. CNIL focused on several processing activities of SPARTOO SAS: 1) recording the customer service calls on a permanent basis, 2) storage of customers' bank details 2) no determination of retention period initially 3) determination of retention period of five years since the customer's last activity 4) establishing as last activity of the prospect customer the mere opening of an email 5) storage of personal data of more than three millions of non-connected customers for more than five years in a non-anonymised way 6) no erasure of personal data on a regular basis, 7) request the customer's health card in Italy in the context of the fight against fraud, 8) lack of strong password policy, 9) not adequate information provided to customers, prospect customers and employees regarding the processing of their personal data. CNIL found that the collection of bank details and the recording of customer service conversations was excessive and not necessary for the purported aim, that is the training of employees, given that only one call per employee was examined per week. Also, the collection of the health cards in Italy was found excessive, and together with the above-mentioned activities, CNIL held that the data minimisation principle had been violated (5§1(c) GDPR). CNIL also found a violation of the storage limitation principle (5§1(e) GDPR), given the lack of retention period in the first place, the storage of data of many inactive customers for more than five years and the excessive storage of prospect customers' personal data, which should be limited to 2 years. Furthermore, the information provided to the data subjects was found inadequate and contrary to the obligation of transparency (13 GDPR). More specifically, CNIL held that there are more leg

Violations (1)

Unclear Cookie Information
high

The cookie banner or cookie policy provides vague, incomplete, or unclear information about what cookies are used and why.

Art. 12, 13 GDPR

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for SPARTOO SAS in FR

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Fine Date

28 July 2020

Authority

Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés

Fine Amount

€250,000

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-2618

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified
Cookie relevance: 20%

Cite as: Cookie Fines. SPARTOO SAS - France (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: