Dream Land S.r.l. – Violation Found (Italy, 2025)
The Italian Data Protection Authority found that Dream Land S.r.l. and Jaguar Land Rover Italia S.p.A. had serious issues with their website's cookie consent process. This is important because unclear cookie policies can mislead users and violate privacy laws. Businesses must ensure their cookie consent banners are easy to understand and comply with regulations.
What happened
Dream Land S.r.l. and Jaguar Land Rover Italia S.p.A. had a cookie consent banner that overlapped with the cookie policy, making it hard for users to read.
Who was affected
Website visitors who tried to manage cookie preferences on the Jaguar Land Rover website were affected.
What the authority found
The authority found that the companies did not provide clear and accessible cookie information, violating GDPR's transparency requirements.
Why this matters
This ruling highlights the need for clear cookie consent mechanisms on websites. Companies should review their cookie policies to avoid similar issues.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
Entities Involved
Jaguar Land Rover Italia S.p.A. (JLRI), the Italian subsidiary of the Jaguar Land Rover group, and Dream Land S.r.l. (Dream Land), an authorized automotive dealer, jointly operated a website used for promotional and commercial purposes. The website was owned by Jaguar Land Rover Limited and made available to Dream Land, whose technical infrastructure was managed by an external supplier provided by JLRI. On 14 February 2024, the Italian DPA's delegated inspection unit accessed the website and found two problems. First, when a user clicked the link to the cookie policy within the consent banner, the banner remained visible and overlapped the policy text, preventing users from reading it in full before deciding whether to accept, reject, or configure cookies. Second, the cookie policy contained contradictory information about the identity of the data controller: it referred at one point to a geographic location rather than a legal entity, listed multiple entities as independent controllers while indicating only one was responsible for handling data subject requests, and referenced a VAT number that did not exist. In March 2024, Dream Land signed a data privacy addendum to the dealership agreement, which described the parties as independent controllers. When the DPA initiated proceedings against JLRI in June 2024, JLRI argued that the website belonged to Dream Land and that it bore no responsibility for the banner configuration. Dream Land, notified in August 2024, argued the banner issue was the result of a technical malfunction and that it operated as an independent controller. First, the DPA held that both JLRI and Dream Land were joint controllers under Article 26 GDPR. Despite the dealership agreement formally describing them as independent controllers, the DPA assessed their roles on a factual basis: both parties had jointly chosen to use the website to pursue shared commercial interests and had thus jointly determined the purposes and means of the processing un
Outcome
Violation Found
The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.
Violations (1)
The cookie banner or cookie policy provides vague, incomplete, or unclear information about what cookies are used and why.
Art. 12, 13 GDPR
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for Dream Land S.r.l. in IT
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
Decision Date
18 December 2025
Authority
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-9871About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Dream Land S.r.l. - Italy (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: