Linkedin – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2024)

Court Ruling
DPA RbAmsterdam7 June 2024Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

A court in the Netherlands ruled that LinkedIn and its partners collected personal data without user consent by placing tracking cookies. Despite users refusing cookies, many were still tracked across websites. This ruling serves as a reminder for companies to respect user privacy choices regarding cookies.

What happened

LinkedIn and its partners placed tracking cookies on users' devices even after they refused consent.

Who was affected

Users who visited websites that used LinkedIn's advertising services were affected by the unauthorized tracking.

What the authority found

The court held that LinkedIn and its partners violated GDPR rules by failing to obtain valid consent for placing cookies on users' devices.

Why this matters

This ruling highlights the need for companies to ensure they have proper consent mechanisms in place for tracking technologies. Website operators should review their cookie policies to comply with privacy laws.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 26(GDPR)
Art. 4(2) GDPR
Art. 4(7) GDPR
Art. 5(2) GDPR
Art. 79(2) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 26(3) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

National Law Articles

AI-identified

Art. 11.7a Dutch Telecommunications Act
Articles 1-14 Dutch Civil Procedure Code
Article 6 Dutch Civil Procedure Code
Article 7 Dutch Civil Procedure Code
Decision AuthorityRechtbank Amsterdam

Entities Involved

Linkedin Ireland(controller)
Linkedin Netherlands(controller)
Microsoft Corporation (US)(controller)
Microsoft Ireland Operations(controller)
Microsoft (NL)(controller)
Xandr (US)(controller)
Source verified 11 April 2026
articles corrected
national law identified
entity split needed
authority corrected
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject visited several popular websites and refused all cookies. However, tracking cookies were still placed on the data subject’s device. The controllers are Linkedin Ireland, Linkedin Netherlands, Microsoft Corporation (US), Microsoft Ireland Operations, Microsoft (NL) and Xandr (US). LinkedIn offers an advertising service and allows for companies to place tracking cookies on the browsers of a user after they view or click their ads. Microsoft has an advertising service that sells ad space on various websites. The service also allows advertisers to show their ads on the ad space of 'third-party' website operators and can place tracking cookies on the devices of website visitors. Xandr is an online platform that buys and sells digital ads. To use the services of Xandr, website users need to install a Java-script that places tracking cookies on the devices of website visitors. All of them are part of the Microsoft Group. The data subject hired a third party specialist to make an independent analysis of the controllers’ collection of personal data via the placed cookies. The analysis confirmed that out of the 30 websites the data subject visited, 27 websites placed and/or read cookies without the data subject’s consent. 24 websites did this even after explicit refusal to consent. Thus, the controllers were collecting personal data of the data subject’s browsing habits without their consent. The data subject filed an urgency procedure (“kort geding”) at the Amsterdam District Court (“Rechtbank Amsterdam”), asking the court to forbid the controllers to place tracking cookies without the data subject’s consent. Jurisdiction of the court [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32012R1215 Brussels I bis Regulation] regulates which courts of the EU Member States have jurisdiction in cases with links to more than one Member State in the EU. [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32012R1215 Article 7(2) Brussels I bi

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Violations (3)

Cookies Placed Before Consent
critical

Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.

Art. 6(1) GDPR

Cookies Persist After Rejection
critical

Tracking cookies remain active or are re-placed even after the user explicitly rejects them.

Art. 6(1) GDPR

Third-Party Cookies Without Consent
critical

Third-party tracking cookies or scripts are loaded without obtaining prior user consent.

Art. 13, 14 GDPR

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Linkedin in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

7 June 2024

Authority

DPA RbAmsterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified
Cookie relevance: 100%

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Linkedin - Netherlands (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: