Court case 3 U 31/25 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2026)
A German court found that a company tracked users without their consent using a specific pixel tool. This ruling is crucial because it reinforces the need for companies to obtain consent before tracking users. It serves as a warning for businesses to ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
What happened
The court ruled that a company used a tracking pixel to collect user data without obtaining proper consent.
Who was affected
Users whose online activities were tracked by the company's pixel tool without their knowledge.
What the authority found
The court determined that the company violated consent requirements for tracking users online.
Why this matters
This case highlights the importance of user consent in data tracking practices. Companies must review their tracking methods to ensure they comply with privacy laws.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
The company used 'M Pixel' to track users' internet activity and infer sensitive information without obtaining prior consent, violating third-party cookie consent requirements.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Violations (1)
Third-party tracking cookies or scripts are loaded without obtaining prior user consent.
Art. 13, 14 GDPR
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 3 U 31/25 in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 3 U 31/25 - Germany (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: