OÜ Dr Mõttus Hambaravi – Complaint Upheld (Estonia, 2026)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
OÜ Dr Mõttus Hambaravi, a dental clinic, faced a complaint for not providing complete personal data to a patient. The clinic partially complied after multiple requests from the Data Protection Authority. This case highlights the importance of transparency and proper data handling in healthcare.
What happened
A dental clinic failed to provide all personal data requested by a patient.
Who was affected
Patients of OÜ Dr Mõttus Hambaravi who requested their personal data.
What the authority found
The authority upheld the complaint, stating the clinic did not adequately demonstrate compliance with data protection rules.
Why this matters
This ruling stresses the need for healthcare providers to ensure transparency and thoroughness in handling patient data requests. It serves as a reminder for clinics to improve their data management practices.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
Entities Involved
OÜ Dr Mõttus Hambaravi, the controller, is a Dental Clinic. On March 2024, the DPA received a complaint from a data subject regarding the fact that the controller had failed to provide all personal data requested. The controller only partially complied after several requests from the DPA. Although the DPA closed the part of the case concerning the access request, it continued investigating the controller’s processing of patients’ personal data when providing Invisalign treatment. The service required the controller to collect and transfer patients’ health data to Align Technology, Inc. However, the contractual documents did not clearly establish whether Align Technology acted as a processor, an independent controller or a joint controller. The controller stated that Align Technology largely determined the conditions of the service, including the consent form and the processing arrangements, and that individual clinics could not unilaterally amend these conditions. The DPA also found that the information provided to patients was incomplete and fragmented. The consent form and privacy information did not clearly explain the legal basis and purposes of processing, the parties involved, data recipients, retention periods, transfers outside the European Union or the safeguards applied to such transfers. Parts of the information were only available in English on external websites. The DPA held that the controller had failed to demonstrate that the processing carried out in connection with the Invisalign service was lawful and transparent under Articles 5(1)(a) and 5(2) GDPR. First, the DPA found that the parties’ roles had not been properly determined. Under Article 4(7) GDPR, the assessment had to be based on which party actually determined the purposes and means of processing, rather than solely on the contractual description of the relationship. The controller decided whether Invisalign treatment was suitable for a patient and collected the relevant health data. It t
Outcome
Complaint Upheld
A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for OÜ Dr Mõttus Hambaravi in EE
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. OÜ Dr Mõttus Hambaravi - Estonia (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: