Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka (AZOP) – Court Ruling (Croatia, 2026)

Court Ruling
DPA USSplit5 May 2026Croatia
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Croatian court upheld a decision that INA, a petrol station chain, did not protect its CCTV feeds properly. This ruling is important because it shows that companies must ensure their surveillance practices are safe and comply with privacy laws.

What happened

INA failed to take necessary measures to prevent unauthorized access to its real-time CCTV feeds.

Who was affected

Customers at INA petrol stations who could see the real-time CCTV feeds.

What the authority found

The court agreed with the data protection authority that INA did not meet the legal requirements for processing personal data safely.

Why this matters

This case highlights that companies must carefully evaluate their surveillance practices to avoid privacy violations. It sets a precedent for how businesses should handle customer data and security.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 5(1) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 83(GDPR)
Art. 32(1) GDPR
Art. 32(2) GDPR
Art. 46(2) GDPR
Art. 57(1)(h) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(i) GDPR
Art. 83(4)(a) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 5(1) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 32(1) GDPR
Art. 32(2) GDPR
Art. 46(2) GDPR
Art. 57(1)(h) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(i) GDPR
Art. 83(GDPR)
Art. 83(4)(a) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
čl. 46. stavku 2. Zakona o provedbi Opće uredbe o zaštiti podataka
čl. 8. čl. 47. st. 1. čl. 98. st. 5. čl. 128. st. 1. Zakon o općem upravnom postupku
članku 47. stavku 3., članka 116. st. 1. , čl.147. st. 1. Zakon o upravnim sporovima
Decision AuthorityUS Split

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 7 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

INA, a petrol station chain in Croatia, appealed, AZOP's, the DPA's, €5000 fine. The fine was based on AZOP's decision that INA, as a controller, did not take all necessary measures to prevent unauthorised access and visibility of the real-time CCTV feeds to all customers. INA disputed this decision, claiming legitimate grounds for such data processing, stressing that projecting real-time CCTV feeds in petrol station shops to customers is an accepted and normal practice in the industry and by the consumers themselves. The Court upheld the DPA's decision regardless, on two crucial grounds: the lack of compliance with the cumulative requirements to fulfil Art 6 GDPR and Art 32 (1 and 2) GDPR. Firstly, the Court sided with the DPA, stating INA, did not meet two of the three cumulative conditions, in depicting a legitimate interest for the purpose of ensuring a timely response by employees and deterring perpetrators of criminal and infringing acts. Therefore, the Court accepted the reasoning that, the requirement of necessity is not met, as the timely reaction by employees and a rapid response in the event of a harmful incident, can be achieved even without customers having real-time access to the video surveillance system. As Art 6(1)(f) prescribes that three conditions must be met cumulatively for the data controller to be able to demonstrate its legitimate interest for a lawful basis, the prescribed conditions are not cumulatively met. Secondly, the Court highlights that the screen's placement in the premises of the retail shop of the petrol station itself, with clear visibility for all, is contrary to Art 32(1) and (2) GDPR. The Court stresses INA failed to take necessary protection measures in accordance with existing and foreseeable risks of unauthorized disclosure of personal data. This becomes especially relevant, as the the controller allows customers, as unauthorised persons, access to the live feed in real time, exposing the personal data to risks such as

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka (AZOP) in HR

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

5 May 2026

Authority

DPA USSplit

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka (AZOP) - Croatia (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: