Leads Work Limited – €292,500 Fine (United Kingdom, 2021)

€292,500Information Commissioner's Office1 March 2021United Kingdom
final
Fine

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Leads Work Limited was fined for sending unsolicited text messages to individuals during the pandemic. This is significant because it highlights the need for companies to obtain proper consent before marketing.

What happened

The company sent 835 unsolicited text messages without proper consent from recipients.

Who was affected

Individuals who received unwanted marketing messages from Leads Work Limited.

What the authority found

The Information Commissioner's Office found that the company did not have valid consent to send these messages, violating GDPR rules.

Why this matters

This case underscores the importance of obtaining clear consent for marketing communications, especially in the digital age.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
View original scraped data
Art. 4(11) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Regulation 22 PECR

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 8 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, amount discrepancy.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Leads Work Limited (LWL) operates within the "multi-level marketing" sector. It enlists downstream recruits under the Avon band name. The UK DPA (Information Commissioner's Office or ICO) received various complaints from individuals concerning text messages/SMS sent under the Avon name. During the Covid-19 pandemic, individuals complained again about Avon sending them unsolicited text messages. Between April 2020 and May 2020, 835 complaints of this nature were recorded by the ICO. Upon investigating further, the ICO identified LWL as the sender of these messages. The ICO notified LWL of the growing complaints concerning these texts. LWL responded to the investigation with information on how they acquired the individuals' data: by purchasing this from third parties and through a website (avon.leadsword.co.uk). The ICO identified that the core data supplier was from an organisation who's website had an opti-in , a privacy notice and an option to unsubscribe. LWL was included as one of the third parties with who data was shared. However, LWL was not included within the list of organisations from whom individuals could expect marketing from. Additionally, it was not possible for individuals to submit details without selecting a marketing channel. The website was also vague, confusing and lengthy. The ICO also identified other websites that contributed to collecting personal data used by LWL to send direct marketing SMS. LWL stated that lawyers had create the website's legal framework and believed it to be compliant with the legal requirements. LWL estimated that between May 2019 and May 2020, around 25 million texts were sent to individuals whose personal data was collected from the above websites. Is sending direct marketing texts to individuals without their consent in breach of Regulation 22 PECR? The UK DPA recalled the wording of Regulation 22 of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (PECR), as well as the definition o

Details

Fine Date

1 March 2021

Authority

Information Commissioner's Office

Fine Amount

€292,500

250,000 GBP

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-3379

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Leads Work Limited - United Kingdom (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: