Enforcing jurisdiction
Slovenia · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

DPA case 07121-1/2020/693 – Order (Slovenia, 2020)

Order
Informacijski pooblaščenec23 April 2020Slovenia
final
Order

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An individual asked if an insurance company could require a five-year-old medical record for a car accident claim. The authority found that while the insurer can ask for necessary documents, it must still follow data protection rules and explain why the information is needed.

What happened

An insurance company requested a five-year-old medical record from an individual to process a claim.

Who was affected

The individual who filed a claim for compensation after a car accident.

What the authority found

The authority stated that the insurer is allowed to request necessary documentation for the claim but must adhere to data protection obligations.

Why this matters

This case highlights the importance of transparency in data requests. Companies must clearly explain why they need personal information to comply with data protection laws.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 13 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 58(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 268(6) ZZavar-1
Art. 268(8) ZZavar-1
Art. 268(11) ZZavar-1

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The IP was informed that an individual had filed a claim for compensation for damage caused by a car accident. The insurer now requires the injured party to have a photocopy of the medical record five years ago. You are wondering if the request is justified and in line with existing personal data protection legislation, especially since the insurance company does not explain why it requires that information. It merely states that they will not resolve the case until the required information has been received. According to Article 268(6),(8) and (11) ZZavar-1. The insurer is entitled to obtain relevant medical records (including the entire medical records card) relating to the insured or beneficiary of the insurance, if such documentation is necessary for different insurance purposes. The IP found that the insurance company is entitled to ask for the documentation necessary to decide on the insurance claim. However, the IP, when issuing an opinion, cannot address the question of whether it is necessary and proportionate for an insurer to request information for five years back. The IP also found that the the insurance company is bound by the information obligation of Article 13 GDPR.

Outcome

Order

A binding order requiring the controller to take specific action.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 07121-1/2020/693 in SI

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Order Date

23 April 2020

Authority

Informacijski pooblaščenec

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-2319

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 07121-1/2020/693 - Slovenia (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: