Enforcing jurisdiction
Slovenia · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

DPA case 07121-1/2020/701 – Order (Slovenia, 2020)

Order
Informacijski pooblaščenec23 April 2020Slovenia
final
Order

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A public institute was questioned about whether it could access personal data related to a researcher's appointment. The authority concluded that while the data might be public, the final decision on its accessibility lies with the data controller.

What happened

A public institute sought to determine if it could access personal data about a researcher's title.

Who was affected

Researchers employed by the public institute.

What the authority found

The authority found that processing personal data for public tasks may be permissible, but the final decision rests with the data controller.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes that organizations must assess their own data processing practices. It encourages public institutions to clarify their data access policies.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6(1)(e) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 58(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 25(2) ZVOP-1

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The IP received a request to issue an opinion on whether the data regarding the appointment of a researcher and the invalidity of the research title are personal data and as such are inaccessible to the Scientific Council of a public institute. The question arose from the fact that the Scientific Council incorrectly named a particular researcher due to lack of access to his personal data. The IP found that the processing of the personal data of researchers by the public institute as controller or the Scientific Council as its expert body may be permissible under Article 6 (1)(e) GDPR in the election to the research title as public task. It added that researchers employed by the public institute are civil servants, thus names and other data related to their employment constitute freely available, public information. It follows that the data on a (valid) research title of a researcher employed by a public institute is probably not personal data at all. However, a concrete and definitive assessment falls under the responsibility of the controller. Pursuant to the Article 25(2) ZVOP-1, the data controllers determine procedures and measures for the protection of personal data and designate the persons responsible for certain files with personal data and persons who process certain data. IP sees in principle no obstacles to the access to the personal data at stake. However, the final assessment of the personal data that can be processed and the respective legal basis has to be made by the data controller.

Outcome

Order

A binding order requiring the controller to take specific action.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 07121-1/2020/701 in SI

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Order Date

23 April 2020

Authority

Informacijski pooblaščenec

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-2327

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 07121-1/2020/701 - Slovenia (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: