Enforcing jurisdiction
Finland · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case 3425/157/2019 – Complaint Upheld (Finland, 2020)

Complaint Upheld
DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu23 July 2020Finland
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Finnish Data Protection Authority upheld a complaint against Acc Consulting for sending direct marketing messages without consent. This ruling is significant because it reinforces the requirement for companies to obtain permission before contacting individuals for marketing purposes.

What happened

Acc Consulting sent direct marketing messages to a person's work phone without prior consent.

Who was affected

Individuals who received unsolicited marketing messages from Acc Consulting.

What the authority found

The authority found that Acc Consulting needed prior consent to send marketing communications to individuals, violating GDPR rules.

Why this matters

This decision highlights the importance of obtaining consent for direct marketing. Companies should ensure they have proper consent mechanisms in place to avoid similar complaints.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 21 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 21(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Section 200(1) Information Society Code (917/2014)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A data subject filed a complaint with the Finnish DPA regarding Acc Consulting company's direct marketing practices. Data subject received direct marketing communications to their work phone. The SMS had a number that the data subject should call to unsubscribe. The data subject tried calling, but no one answered. The controller claimed that they did not need prior consent from the recipient as the direct marketing communications was not directed towards a natural person, but rather a legal person under section 202 of the national Information Society Code (917/2014). DPA considered the following legal questions: 1) Has the controller sent out direct marketing communications? 2) If yes, was the marketing communication directed at a legal or a natural person? 3) Had the controller given the data subject the right to object to direct marketing as per Article 21 GDPR? DPA held that the controller had sent out direct marketing communications and that it was directed towards a natural person under section 200 subsection 1 of the national Information Society Code (917/2014), and thusly the controller would have needed the data subject's prior consent. The controller must give the data subject an opportunity to unsubscribe easily and without payment. The controller must correct its direct marketing communications practice and is obliged to notify the DPA of any changes. The decision is not final.

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 3425/157/2019 in FI

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

23 July 2020

Authority

DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-2625

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 3425/157/2019 - Finland (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: