- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Iceland · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
DPA case nr. 2020010678 – Dismissed (Iceland, 2020)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Persónuvernd dismissed a complaint against Creditinfo for processing personal data to create a credit report. The complainant argued that using old financial information was unfair, but the authority found Creditinfo's actions were lawful. This decision highlights that companies can use certain data for legitimate interests, like credit assessments.
What happened
Creditinfo processed personal data to create a creditworthiness report using information that included data up to four years old.
Who was affected
Individuals whose creditworthiness was assessed by Creditinfo using their personal data.
What the authority found
The Persónuvernd ruled that Creditinfo had a legitimate interest in processing the data, complying with GDPR's requirements.
Why this matters
This case shows that companies can rely on legitimate interests to process personal data for credit assessments. Businesses should ensure they have a valid legal basis for using personal data.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The complainant filed a complaint with the Persónuvernd because their personal data was processed by a credit agency for the purpose of making a report on the complainant's creditworthiness. The complainant argued that because Creditinfo's rating was based on, among other things, information that was up to four years old, including information on the complainant's temporary financial difficulties, the processing involved in the making of the rating did not comply with data protection rules. Creditinfo disputed this argument. Was the processing by Creditinfo a violation of the GDPR? The Persónuvernd held that the processing was lawful for several reasons. Regarding the GDPR, it held that Article 6(1)(f) applied as a lawful basis for the processing, on the basis that Creditinfo had a legitimate interest in processing the information for the preparation of a report on the complainant's credit rating. It also held that the Article 5(1) principles of transparency, purpose limitation and data minimisation were not violated in this case. The Persónuvernd also cited several of its earlier decisions where it also decided that Creditinfo was allowed to use information on the entry in the company's default register when preparing reports on the complainants' credit ratings, for four years from the registration of such information.
Outcome
Dismissed
The complaint or investigation was dismissed.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case nr. 2020010678 in IS
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case nr. 2020010678 - Iceland (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: