DPA case 9685994 – Violation Found (Italy, 2021)

Violation Found
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali22 July 2021Italy
final
Violation Found

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Italy's data protection authority found that Deliveroo did not properly inform its riders about how their data was used. This is significant because it shows that companies must be transparent about their data practices to avoid penalties.

What happened

Deliveroo was found to have violated multiple GDPR rules regarding transparency and data processing.

Who was affected

The riders using the Deliveroo app who were not adequately informed about their data usage.

What the authority found

The Italian authority determined that Deliveroo failed to provide clear information about data management and processing methods.

Why this matters

This case serves as a warning to companies about the importance of transparency in data handling. Businesses should ensure their privacy policies are clear and comprehensive to avoid similar issues.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 25(GDPR)
Art. 32(GDPR)
Art. 35(GDPR)
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 88(GDPR)
Art. 22(3) GDPR
Art. 30(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 30(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 30(1)(g) GDPR
Art. 37(7) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 22(3) GDPR
Art. 25(GDPR)
Art. 30(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 30(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 30(1)(g) GDPR
Art. 32(GDPR)
Art. 35(GDPR)
Art. 37(GDPR)
Art. 88(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: amount discrepancy.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Deliveroo Italy is owned by the UK company Roofoods LTD, whose data center is located in Ireland. They are joint controllers of rider data. When the Garante started to investigate Deliveroo Italy, Roofoods clarified that Deliveroo Italy had 8,000 riders who use the Deliveroo rider app. Roofoods acquires personal and contract data, payment data, data relating to the vehicle used for deliveries, and determines how to process riders’ data. It claims that the rider booking system in Italy is based on availability during critical time slots and reliability of the rider (ie actual participation in the reserved shifts or cancellation prior to the start of the shift). The app also tracks the management of an order by a rider (from acceptance of the order to delivery) and tracks the location of the rider every twelve seconds. After investigation, the Garante notified Deliveroo Italy and Roofoods that it had found violations of Articles 5(1)(a)(c)(e), 13, 22(3), 25, 30(1)(c)(f)(g), 32, 35, 37(7), and 88 of the GDPR. In defensive briefs, UK Roofoods contended that it was going to review its data retention policies, that Deliveroo riders were sufficiently informed about the data processed on them, and that data collected on riders (such as geographical position) was necessary for the service. It also argued that statistics about the algorithms behind the booking system are available to riders on a dedicated page in the app, and that on Sunday each rider is informed about their access to booking times for the following week. Just one month after Foodinho was fined €2,600,000 for intransparent rider management algorithms, the Garante decided to issue a very similar fine against Deliveroo. First, the Garante held that Deliveroo had provided inadequate information amount management algorithms to interested parties (riders) and to failed to comply with the principle of transparency. The privacy policy provided to riders failed to indicate the concrete methods of processing data

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 9685994 in IT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

22 July 2021

Authority

Garante per la protezione dei dati personali

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-3691

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 9685994 - Italy (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: