DPA case 521.13874 – Complaint Upheld (Germany, 2021)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An online shop was found to have sent newsletters to a customer without their consent. This is important because it highlights the need for businesses to respect customer preferences regarding marketing communications.
What happened
An eBay shop sent newsletters to a customer who had not given consent for this communication.
Who was affected
A customer who ordered from the online shop and received unsolicited newsletters.
What the authority found
The Data Protection Authority ruled that the shop violated GDPR by sending newsletters without a legal basis, as the customer had not consented.
Why this matters
This ruling serves as a reminder for online businesses to obtain clear consent before sending marketing emails. Companies should ensure their email practices comply with data protection laws.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
A data subject placed an online order with a shop (the controller) on eBay. More than half a year later, the controller started sending them weekly newsletters via email. Although the controller's privacy policy claimed that newsletters would only be sent if the data subject had given consent, Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, the data subject had never consented. On 5 November 2020, the data subject sent an access request to the controller, invoking their right laid down in Article 15(1) GDPR. Since the controller did not reply, the data subject sent a reminder on 7 December 2020. Again, the controller did not reply. Initially, the controller didn't respond to the DPA's request for a statement. Only after the DPA issued an administrative notice forcing the company to answer the access request and threatened a penalty payment did the controller respond to the data subject. However, this initial response only mentioned the categories of processed personal data and did not include a copy of the personal data. Only after another reclamation by the data subject did the controller provide a copy. The DPA held that the controller violated Article 6(1) GDPR, since the newsletter was sent without a legal basis. First, the data subject had not given consent, Article 6(1)(a). Moreover, the DPA held that the controller could not rely on a legitimate interest, Article 6(1)(f). While the term "legitimate interest" is to be interpreted broadly, it can no longer be assumed if the processing violates another legal norm. § 7(2)(3) UWG (German Act against Unfair Competition) declares advertising using electronic mail without the addressee's prior express consent as an "unacceptable nuisance". The exemption under § 7(3)(4) UWG only applies if the controller clearly and unequivocally informed the data subject, at the time of the collection of the email address, that it will be used for advertising purposes. The controller had not done that by their own admission. Thus, the DPA concluded that
Outcome
Complaint Upheld
A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 521.13874 in DE
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 521.13874 - Germany (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: