Enforcing jurisdiction
Italy · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case 9896808; – Violation Found (Italy, 2023)

Violation Found
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali13 April 2023Italy
final
Violation Found

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An art museum used a face detection system to gather information about visitors without properly informing them. This is important because it shows that even museums must be clear about how they collect and use personal data.

What happened

The museum implemented a face detection system to analyze visitor interactions with art but did not adequately inform visitors about it.

Who was affected

Visitors to the Municipal Art Collections in Bologna who were unknowingly tracked by the face detection system.

What the authority found

The authority determined that the face detection system processed personal data, contrary to claims made by the museum.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes that organizations must be transparent about data collection methods. Museums and similar institutions should review their practices to ensure compliance with data protection laws.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6 GDPR
Art. 12 GDPR
Art. 13 GDPR
Art. 26 GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 12(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 26(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

No issues were reported by that automated check.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A "ShareArt" project was implemented in the Municipal Art Collections of Palazzo D'Accursio in Bologna in order to obtain information on the characteristics of the visitors and on the ways in which they interacted with some works of art. The project followed a collaboration agreement between ENEA and the Bologna Museums Institution which is an instrumental body of the Municipality of Bologna (the “Municipality”). The information was collected with a system using a face detection algorithm (“ShareArt”) developed by the National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (“ENEA”). The face detection algorithm was based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) to detect faces in the images. Visitors were informed about the system with a notice at the ticket office that stated, inter alia, that the algorithm "does not imply face recognition”. An Italian civil rights organisation (Hermes Center for Transparency and Digital Human Rights) submitted a report to the Italian DPA in relation to the used ShareArt system. The report stated, inter alia, that ShareArt, using a camera, automatically detected faces looking in the direction of art work, contextually acquiring a series of information relating to behaviour when observing works of art. The report highlighted that only very few signs were in place to indicate to the museum visitors that the system was used: small black cameras attached to the walls and a disclaimer at the ticket office. Following the report, the DPA launched an investigation and requested for information from the Municipality as well as ENEA. The parties argued, inter alia, that the system does not involve the collection and processing of data relating to identified or identifiable natural persons. Moreover, the Municipality viewed that it did not have any kind of role with regard to the data processing. Contrary to what was claimed by the controllers, the DPA found that the face detection algorithms process personal data

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 9896808; in IT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

13 April 2023

Authority

Garante per la protezione dei dati personali

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-6060

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 9896808; - Italy (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: