DPA case NAIH-2727-2/2022. – €28,298 Fine (Hungary, 2022)

€28,298Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság11 February 2022Hungary
final
Fine

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Hungarian debt collection company was fined €28,298 for failing to erase a man's personal data after he requested it. The authority found that the company did not properly handle his request and continued to process his information unlawfully. This case highlights the importance of respecting individuals' rights to have their data deleted when requested.

What happened

The Hungarian data protection authority fined a debt collection company for not deleting a man's personal data as he requested.

Who was affected

The affected person was an heir of a deceased individual who contested a debt claim against him.

What the authority found

The authority ruled that the company unlawfully processed the man's personal data by not complying with his erasure request.

Why this matters

This case emphasizes that companies must take requests for data deletion seriously and act on them promptly to avoid penalties.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 5(2) GDPR
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 12(1) GDPR
Art. 12(4) GDPR
Art. 15(3) GDPR
Art. 17(3)(b) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(2) GDPR
Art. 12(1) GDPR
Art. 12(4) GDPR
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 15(3) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Act V of 2013 on the Civil Code
Act CCXXXVII of 2013 on Credit Institutions and Financial Enterprises

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller (a debt management company ) sought to collect a debt from an heir of a person deceased in 2013. Following a notice received on 23 June 2021, the data subject (the heir) called to inform the controller that in his view, the claim was not justifiable. Based on the Hungarian Act V of 2013 on the Civil Code, a claim expires after 5 years, and also, heirs are liable only up to the amount of the inherited estate. The data subject also asked the controller to erase all personal data relating to this case. As no measures were taken by the controller, the data subject called a second time on 15 July 2021, when he requested the controller to send him the audio recording of his previous call. The phone operator of the controller could not find any reference to the first phone conversation and informed the data subject that the request for erasure had to be submitted in writing. After the controller received an inquiry by the DPA, it claimed that it had initiated the proceedings against the data subject based on an administrative error. It was determined in an internal review that the data subject's verbal request for erasure was fully justified and the controller's phone operator failed to register it as a complaint. As a result, the controller notified the data subject that it irretrievably deleted the relevant personal data from its records, while retaining a copy of the order of the public notary about the estate (including name, date and place of birth of the data subject, as well as his mother's name) based on its legal obligation to keep records under Act CCXXXVII of 2013 on Credit Institutions and Financial Enterprises and also on the basis of Article 6(1)(c) GDPR. First, the DPA considered the processing of personal data for the purpose of debt collection. It was clear from the probate order obtained in 2016 that the amount of debts exceeded the amount of the active assets and hence the controller's claim was unjustified. Nevertheless, after receip

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case NAIH-2727-2/2022. in HU

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Fine Date

11 February 2022

Authority

Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság

Fine Amount

€28,298

10,000,000 HUF

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5013

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case NAIH-2727-2/2022. - Hungary (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: