DPA case 2.1.-1/22/1396 – Order (Estonia, 2022)

Order
Andmekaitse Inspektsioon5 October 2022Estonia
final
Order

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Estonian DPA ordered a company to stop filming beyond its property and delete existing recordings. This decision is important for ensuring that companies respect privacy boundaries.

What happened

The Estonian DPA ordered a company to cease filming outside its property.

Who was affected

People living near the company's property were affected by the filming.

What the authority found

The authority mandated that the company must delete existing recordings and provide lawful surveillance information.

Why this matters

This ruling reinforces the need for companies to respect privacy boundaries and follow regulations regarding surveillance. It serves as a reminder for businesses to ensure their practices comply with privacy laws.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 12(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 5(1) GDPR
Art. 5(2) GDPR
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 13(1)(d) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(i) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(GDPR)
Art. 5(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 5(2) GDPR
Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 12(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 58(1) GDPR
Art. 58(1)(d) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(e) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(f) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 5 October 2022, the Estonian DPA ordered an anonymised controller to stop filming beyond their property, delete existing recordings, document camera adjustments and provide lawful surveillance information. A EUR 2,000 coercive payment was conditional on future failure to comply and was not an imposed fine.

Outcome

Order

A binding order requiring the controller to take specific action.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 2.1.-1/22/1396 in EE

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Order Date

5 October 2022

Authority

Andmekaitse Inspektsioon

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5469

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 2.1.-1/22/1396 - Estonia (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: