Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case 3L 1028.19 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA VGBerlin28 February 2020Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in Berlin ruled that a school did not have to delete a student's record of behavior, even after he changed schools. The court decided the record was still necessary for the school's duties. This case shows that schools can keep certain records for educational purposes.

What happened

The court ruled that a school record containing a student's behavioral notes should not be deleted.

Who was affected

The student and his parents were involved in this case regarding the school record.

What the authority found

The court held that the school had a valid reason to retain the student's record under data protection rules.

Why this matters

This ruling clarifies that educational institutions can maintain records necessary for their functions, which may affect how schools handle student data in the future.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 17(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 17(1)(d) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 17(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 17(1)(d) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityVG Berlin

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 17 March 2026.

Processing notes: authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The plaintiff visited a school in Berlin where a record with notes from teachers about his behavior was created. The school record contains his insulting statements to classmates and teachers and notes because of disrupted teaching. The student changes the school recently. Were the requirements of Article 17 GDPR fulfilled and would the defendant require to delete the school record? Article 17 (1) (a) GDPR grants a right to delete personal data, if the purpose for which the personal data was collected no longer exists and further storage is no longer necessary. The court did not see such a loss of purpose in this case. The VG held the applicable school regulation against the student and his parents. It stipulates that a change of school does not justify a loss of purpose. According to the school regulation the processing of personal data relating to pupils and legal guardians is necessary for the school to perform its tasks. This applies in particular to students' breaches of duty in order to be able to take the appropriate pedagogical measures and compare them with their effects in the past. The concerned school record shall be kept during the mandatory school period according to the school regulation. Since the student is still obliged to go to school, it can be assumed that the documents collected will continue to serve their purpose. Furthermore, the applicants have not made it credible that the personal data within the meaning of Article 17 (1) (d) GDPR were processed illegally.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 3L 1028.19 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

28 February 2020

Authority

DPA VGBerlin

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 3L 1028.19 - Germany (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: