Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case 12 K 213/19 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA FGNiedersachsen28 January 2020Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in Germany ruled that the GDPR does not apply to certain tax-related data requests. This decision clarifies that not all personal data requests fall under GDPR, especially in tax matters. It’s important for individuals and companies to know the limits of data protection laws.

What happened

The court determined that the GDPR does not apply to personal data processed in non-harmonized tax matters.

Who was affected

Individuals requesting access to their tax-related personal data were affected.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the GDPR is only applicable to harmonized taxes, like VAT, and not to income taxes.

Why this matters

This ruling sets a precedent for how tax-related personal data requests are handled. It reminds individuals and businesses to understand the specific legal frameworks that apply to their situations.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 2(2)(a) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 2(2)(a) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityFG Niedersachsen

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 19 March 2026.

Processing notes: authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The plaintiffs claimed the right to inspect files in accordance with Article 15 (1) GDPR. They argued that the scope of application of the GDPR is not excluded according to Article 2 (2) because the GDPR should be applicable to all types of tax in favor of those affected. The Court had to assess whether the GDPR is applicable to a access request concerning personal data processed by the tax authority. According to Article 2 (2)(a) GDPR the regulation does not apply to the processing of personal data as part of an activity that does not fall within the scope of Union law. Therefore, the court ruled that the provisions of the GDPR in the area of tax law are only applicable to harmonized taxes, such as VAT, but not in the area of income taxation of natural persons. In this respect, there is no corresponding harmonization in the area of the European Union. The court explained further that the national legislature has not extended the material scope of application of the standard of Article 2 GDPR to the area of non-harmonized taxes. Accordingly, the Court denied the requested access according to Article 15 GDPR.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 12 K 213/19 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

28 January 2020

Authority

DPA FGNiedersachsen

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 12 K 213/19 - Germany (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: