Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Datenschutzbehörde (Austrian Data Protection Authority) – Court Ruling (Austria, 2020)

Court Ruling
Datenschutzbehörde21 October 2020Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court upheld a decision that a credit reference agency could keep records of payment defaults for up to five years after debts were cleared. However, it also ruled that the agency must delete outdated address information. This case shows the balance between credit history and privacy rights.

What happened

The court confirmed that a credit reference agency can retain payment default data for five years after debts are cleared.

Who was affected

The person who requested the deletion of their cleared payment defaults and address data.

What the authority found

The court upheld the authority's decision, agreeing that the agency's retention of payment default data was lawful under existing rules.

Why this matters

This case illustrates the importance of understanding how long personal data can be retained. Businesses should ensure they comply with data retention guidelines to avoid privacy issues.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5 GDPR
Art. 6 GDPR
Art. 12 GDPR
Art. 14 GDPR
Art. 17 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(GDPR)
Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 12(GDPR)
Art. 14(GDPR)
Art. 17(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityBVwG
Reviewed AuthorityDSB (Austria)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

No issues were reported by that automated check.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

In April 2019, the data subject sent an request for erasure of data on several payment defaults and some address data to the credit reference agency (CRA) CRIF GmbH because the debts had all been cleared. The CRA refused the erasure, stating that the data was still relevant for the purposes of assessing the data subject's creditworthiness. In June 2019, the data subject lodged a complaint with the Austrian DPA (Datenschutzbehörde - DSB), stating that all debts still stored in the CRA's data base have been cleared and that several debts only concerned insignificant amounts. The DSB rejected the complaint regarding the data on payment defaults but ordered the CRA to delete data on an old address of the data subject. The DSB held that the data on the payment defaults concern a total amount of more than EUR 3,000 and that none of the debts has been cleared more than 5 years ago. Under case law by the BVwG (see BVwG - W211 2225136-1), CRAs are allowed to store data on payment defaults or insolvencies for a five-year period after the clearance of the debt. The data subject filed an appeal against this decision by the DSB. In this appeal he/she also argued (for the first) time, that the CRA had also violated Article 14 GDPR because the data subject had never been informed about the processing of his/her data. Hence, the data must also be deleted under Article 17(1)(d) GDPR. Was the CRA allowed to still store data on payment defaults after the debts have been cleared? If so, for how long? Does the failure to inform the data subject under Article 14 GDPR result in the general unlawfulness of the processing and the obligation for the controller to delete the data under Article 17(1)(d) GDPR? The BVwG rejected the appeal and fully upheld the decision by the DSB. On the issue of storage duration of the data on payment defaults, the BVwG agreed with the DSB's reasoning and held that none of the data must be erased at the time of the decision. All the data stored could still

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Datenschutzbehörde (Austrian Data Protection Authority) in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

21 October 2020

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Datenschutzbehörde (Austrian Data Protection Authority) - Austria (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: