Google LLC – Court Ruling (France, 2021)

Court Ruling
Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés4 March 2021France
final
ePrivacy
Court Ruling

France's highest administrative court ruled that the French data protection authority, CNIL, was right to fine Google for cookie violations, even though CNIL wasn't Google's lead authority in the EU. The court confirmed CNIL's power to enforce cookie rules under French law. This decision clarifies that local authorities can act on cookie issues, emphasizing the need for businesses to comply with local data protection laws.

What happened

The Conseil d’État upheld CNIL's territorial competence to fine Google for cookie violations on its French website.

Who was affected

The ruling affected users of Google's French website who were subject to cookie tracking without proper consent.

What the authority found

The court ruled that CNIL was territorially competent to enforce cookie regulations against Google under French law, despite not being the lead supervisory authority.

Why this matters

This ruling highlights that local data protection authorities can enforce cookie compliance independently of the One Stop Shop mechanism. Businesses should ensure their cookie practices comply with local regulations, not just those of their lead supervisory authority.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 5(3) ePrivacy Directive GDPR
Art. 56 GDPR
Art. 82 Loi Informatique et Libertés GDPR
Art. 94 GDPR

National Law Articles

Article 16 Law Informatique et Libertés
Article 20 Law Informatique et Libertés
Article 3(1) Law Informatique et Libertés
Article 8 Law Informatique et Libertés
Article 82 Law Informatique et Libertés
Decision AuthorityCE
Reviewed AuthorityCNIL (France)
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On December, 7 2020, the French DPA imposed a financial penalty of 60 Million euros fine against Google LLC and a 40 million euros against Google Ireland Limited in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and ePrivacy Directive, for lack of transparency, inadequate information and lack of valid consent regarding for violating the regulation on cookies while operating the website [https://google.fr google.fr]. The sanction was accompanied by an order to comply with [https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/article_lc/LEGIARTI000037813978 article 82 of the French Law on data protection] (Law Informatique et Libertés), under three months on penalty of a €100000 fine per day of delay. The companies appealed to the Conseil d’État in interim procedure against the CNIL's decision, arguing that the French DPA was not the competent authority because it was not the lead supervisory authority for Google LLC or Google Ireland Limited. Is the CNIL territorially competent to investigate and sanction a company for violating the information principle when depositing cookies if it is not the lead supervisory authority of the company? The CNIL considered that Google does have EU headquarters in Ireland, but that this Irish entity ‘did not have a decision making power’ in relation to the relevant cross-border data processing activities to which the complaints related. For that reason the CNIL decided that the One Stop Shop mechanism did not apply and that the CNIL, like any other European supervisory authority, was therefore competent to make a decision. The Conseil d’État rejected the request made by Google and ruled that the French DPA was territorially competent on this matter even though it is not the lead supervisory authority. The court stated that Article 82 of the Law Informatique et Libertés was a transposition of article 5(3) of the Directive 2002/58/CE into French Law when dealing with cookies and that the CNIL is charged with enforcing this Directive.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Violations (3)

No Reject Button
critical

Cookie banner does not provide a clear reject/refuse all button at the same level as the accept button.

Art. 7 GDPR

Cookies Placed Before Consent
critical

Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.

Art. 6(1) GDPR

Unclear Cookie Information
high

The cookie banner or cookie policy provides vague, incomplete, or unclear information about what cookies are used and why.

Art. 12, 13 GDPR

Details

Ruling Date

4 March 2021

Authority

Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Google LLC - France (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: