The claimant Walter Tzvi Soriano and the defendants, including Forensic News LLC – Court Ruling (United Kingdom, 2021)
The UK High Court ruled that the GDPR does not apply to the US-based news site Forensic News LLC. The court found that the site did not have enough connections to the UK, such as employees or targeted services, to fall under GDPR rules. This decision clarifies when GDPR can apply to non-EU companies.
What happened
The UK High Court decided that GDPR does not apply to Forensic News LLC, a US-based news website.
Who was affected
The case involved Walter Tzvi Soriano, who claimed his data rights were breached by Forensic News LLC's articles.
What the authority found
The court ruled that Forensic News LLC did not meet the criteria for GDPR's extraterritorial application, as it lacked a stable presence and did not target or monitor UK individuals sufficiently.
Why this matters
This ruling helps define when non-EU companies might be subject to GDPR, emphasizing the need for a significant connection to the EU. Businesses outside the EU should assess their activities to determine if they fall under GDPR's reach.
GDPR Articles Cited
The High Court of England and Wales examined a claim against the news website Forensic News LLC and several journalists contributing to its articles. Both the news website and the journalists are based in the US. The claim concerned different news articles containing allegations on the claimant’s connection with an Israeli intelligence company, which the claimant asserted represented a breach of the GDPR and several other laws. As preliminary point of law, the court considered the question whether GDPR is applicable to the situation at hand. Concretely, the court examined whether the matter could fall under any of the three criteria for the extraterritorial application of the GDPR, as prescribed by Articles 3(1), 3(2) and 79(2) of the GDPR. The criteria considered were – whether Forensic News LLC had an establishment in the EU, whether it offered goods and services to individuals in the EU, and whether it monitored the behavior of individuals in the EU. On the first point, the court found that Forensic News LLC did not have any stable arrangements in the UK, and the “establishment” criteria was therefore not met. For this conclusion, it was decisive that the news website had no employees or representatives in the UK. On the other hand, the fact that Forensic News LLC had a readership in the UK and a “handful” of UK subscriptions was not sufficient to prove establishment. On the second point, the court’s position was that Forensic News LLC did not directly target UK consumers with its goods and services. The fact that the UK is a shipping destination for the website’s merchandise was disregarded due to lack of actual purchases – the court found that, in the UK, only one baseball cap was purchased from the website. Finally, on the third point, the court considered that the monitoring undertaken by Forensic News LLC was not sufficient to justify extraterritorial application of the GDPR. Namely, the news website used cookies for the purpose of behavioral profili
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for The claimant Walter Tzvi Soriano and the defendants, including Forensic News LLC in UK
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. The claimant Walter Tzvi Soriano and the defendants, including Forensic News LLC - United Kingdom (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: