UBER B.V. – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2021)

Court Ruling
DPA RbAmsterdam11 March 2021Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch court ruled that Uber did not fully comply with drivers' requests for their personal data. The drivers argued that Uber's data files were incomplete and not in the required format. This case highlights the importance of companies providing complete and accessible data to users who request it.

What happened

Uber did not provide complete personal data to drivers who requested it, according to a court ruling.

Who was affected

Drivers using Uber's app in the UK who requested access to their personal data.

What the authority found

The court found that Uber did not fully meet its obligations to provide drivers with their complete personal data in a structured and accessible format.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes that companies must ensure they provide full and accessible personal data when users request it. Businesses should review their data access procedures to avoid similar issues.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 15 GDPR
Art. 20 GDPR
Art. 22 GDPR
Art. 35 GDPR
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 4(4) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 12(3) GDPR
Art. 12(6) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR
Art. 15(1)(h) GDPR
Art. 15(4) GDPR
Art. 20(1) GDPR
Art. 22(3) GDPR
Art. 41(1) GDPR

National Law Articles

Article 3(1) Rome I Regulation
Article 4 Brussels I (Recast) Regulation
Decision AuthorityRb. Amsterdam
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The 10 plaintiffs are or were engaged to drive with the app of the defendant, Uber, in the United Kingdom. The plaintiffs are part of the App for Drivers and Couriers Union (ADCU) which protects their interests as private drivers and couriers in the UK. ADCU is itself a member of International Alliance of App Transport Workers (IAATW). ADCU and IAATW want to create a database of the personal information of drivers at Uber. The plaintiffs have made requests by email or via the Uber Driver App to access the data processed by Uber concerning them. Uber provided digital files in response to these requests. The plaintiffs asked the court to review the digital files provided and to order Uber to provide explanation on a series of questions relating to the files given. The plaintiffs claimed that the files given were not complete as the data given did not contain the full information that they were entitled to. The plaintiffs also claimed that the decision was automated within the scope of Article 22 and therefore Article 15(1)(h) applies. They also claimed to have a right to data portability under Article 20(1) GDPR and that information should be provided in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format. They claim that Uber only provided a small part of the data in the required format. The plaintiffs asked the court to order Uber to: I. a) provide, within one month of notification and in a standard electronic form, access to: (i) personal data which Uber processes, such as the "Driver’s Profile" including the records of Uber employees, "Tags", and "Report", (ii) the purposes for processing, the categories of personal data, recipients or categories of recipients to whom the personal data have been or will be disclosed, in particular recipients in third countries or international organisations and the storage period (iii) in the event of transfer to a third country or to an international organisation; the appropriate safeguards applied by Uber pursuant to art

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for UBER B.V. in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

11 March 2021

Authority

DPA RbAmsterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. UBER B.V. - Netherlands (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: