Court case VerfGH Lv 15/20 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2020)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Constitutional Court of the Saarland ruled that contact tracing rules in Saarland interfered too much with people's privacy. The court said that such detailed data collection should be decided by a parliamentary law, not just a government order. This case is important because it highlights the need for clear legal frameworks when handling personal data during public health measures.
What happened
The court found that the contact tracing rules in Saarland allowed excessive collection and sharing of personal data without proper legal backing.
Who was affected
Citizens attending events or places in Saarland who were required to provide personal contact information.
What the authority found
The Saarland Constitutional Court ruled that the contact tracing regulation was an excessive interference with privacy and required a parliamentary law.
Why this matters
This decision emphasizes the need for strong legal frameworks to protect privacy, especially during health crises. It warns against overreach in data collection without proper legislative backing.
GDPR Articles Cited
National Law Articles
In the Saarland, Art. 2 § 3 CP-VO regulated contact tracing. This tracing serves to interrupt chains of infection. The aim is to find out who may have had close contact with an infected person so that he/she can be placed in (self-)quarantine and tested in order to avoid infecting other people unintentionally. Those responsible for catering, cultural facilities and events, indoor playgrounds, church services and funerals, sports and other related events according to Art. 2 § 6 CP-VO, hotels and other accommodation providers as well as prostitution businesses are obliged to do to keep the information: - First name and surname, - Place of residence - Accessibility and - the arrival time of one representative of each household present They must be handed over to the health authorities on request. It is also provided that these data are to be deleted within one month. The standard does not lay down any requirements for the organisation of the collection of contact data. In the field of gastronomy, in particular, this often leads to the fact that subsequent guests can recognise and remember who has visited the company before them and how they can be reached via telephone number, e-mail address or postal address. This is a significant interference in the right to data protection. By recording, storing and possibly also passing on address and contact data, citizens - holders of fundamental rights - could be indirectly deterred from attending certain events or places. Indeed, the idea can be frightening if it is precisely documented and, if necessary, the state is informed from when to when one has visited which restaurant, political, religious or cultural event. According to the Constitutional Court of the Saarland, such a far-reaching, serious interference with the fundamental right to data protection cannot be decided by government decree. A parliamentary law is also necessary, because it is not (any longer) a short-term emergency situation, but a regulation which i
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case VerfGH Lv 15/20 in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case VerfGH Lv 15/20 - Germany (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: