Data Protection Authority - DSB (appellant and applicant) – Court Ruling (Austria, 2021)

Court Ruling
DPA BVwG27 January 2021Austria
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Austria's Federal Administrative Court overturned a decision that restricted the Public Employment Service from using an algorithm to predict jobseekers' employment chances. The court found that the service could continue using the tool if they had a legal basis for processing the data. This is important for businesses using automated decision-making tools to ensure they have proper legal grounds.

What happened

The court allowed the Public Employment Service to use an algorithm for predicting jobseekers' employment chances if a legal basis is established.

Who was affected

Jobseekers whose data was used by the Public Employment Service to predict their employment chances.

What the authority found

The court decided that the Public Employment Service could use the algorithm as long as there is a suitable legal basis for processing the data.

Why this matters

This case highlights the importance of having a legal basis when using automated tools for decision-making. Companies should ensure compliance with data protection laws when implementing similar technologies.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 6 GDPR
Art. 9 GDPR
Art. 22 GDPR

National Law Articles

§30 (2) VwGG
Decision AuthorityBVwG
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The Public Employment Service (AMS) is a service provider under public law with its own legal personality. It is responsible for implementing the labour market policy of the federal government. In order to support workers in their (re-)integration into the labour market, it offers various services which are implemented by its counsellors. In the course of a counselling interview, counsellors have to discuss the client's wishes/expectations, their previous life history and the reasons for their unemployment. The jobseeker's chances on the labour market should also be addressed and discussed. In order to support counsellors in assessing the labour market opportunities of jobseekers, the AMS has developed a concept for calculating the labour market opportunities of jobseekers (AMAS) In concrete terms, AMS uses an algorithm to automatically calculate the probability of currently registered customers being employed for a certain number of days within a certain period in the future. For this purpose, a so called IC is calculated from the following data: age group, gender, group of States, education, health impairment, caring duties, professional group, pre-career regional labour market performance, duration of the business case at the AMS Based on the calculated IC, a classification is made into the following groups: Service clients with high labour market opportunities, care clients with low labour market opportunities, counselling clients with medium labour market opportunities. In order to ensure that the counsellors do not adopt AMAS unquestioningly, the AMS has issued guidelines and corresponding instructions as well as conducted training courses. The Data Protection Authority (DSB) initiated an ex officio investigation into the matter and concluded that the AMS was prohibited from processing data with the help of the AMAS with effect from 1 January 2021, unless there is a suitable legal basis for the data processing. This decision was then repealed by the Federal A

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Data Protection Authority - DSB (appellant and applicant) in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

27 January 2021

Authority

DPA BVwG

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Data Protection Authority - DSB (appellant and applicant) - Austria (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: