Court case II C 1228/19 – Court Ruling (Poland, 2022)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An electricity company accidentally emailed a customer's personal data to another client, leading to a court case in Poland. The court confirmed this was a data breach under GDPR. This case shows the importance of handling personal data carefully to avoid breaches and potential legal actions.
What happened
An electricity company mistakenly sent a customer's personal data to another client via email.
Who was affected
Customers whose personal data, including names and addresses, were accidentally shared with another client.
What the authority found
The District Court of Warsaw-Praga confirmed the incident was a 'personal data breach' under GDPR.
Why this matters
This case highlights the risks of data mishandling and the potential for legal consequences. Companies must ensure robust data protection practices to prevent breaches and maintain customer trust.
GDPR Articles Cited
The controller (the defendant) was an electricity company. The data subject (the plaintiff) was a customer. On 6 February 2019, due to an error, an employee of the defendant emailed to one of the company’s clients a file containing the personal data of other clients (data subjects), including the the plaintiff's. The information included: first name, surname, ID number, address, customer number, and numbers of invoices. After learning about the security breach, the defendant notified the Polish DPA of the incident. The defendant also sent a notification to the affected data subjects and asked the recipients of the unintentional disclosure the delete the file. After receiving a notice of the security breach, the plaintiff filed a complaint with the Polish DPA. Moreover, she requested the defendant to terminate her contract by mutual agreement due to the loss of confidence. The defendant stated that a one time breach of the plaintiff’s personal data did not constitute a gross breach of contract and therefore did not provide grounds for termination of the contract. Hence, the plaintiff decided to terminate the contract herself despite a financial penalty. Moreover, due to the security breach and fear that her personal data could be used by third parties, she set up a subscription account with the Credit Information Bureau to receive information on credit obligations attributed to her. On top of that, she suffered non-pecuniary harm from the stress and psychological discomfort related to the fear that her personal data could be used by third parties. Apart from the proceedings at the DPA, the plaintiff brought an action to court seeking damages for the non-material harm caused by the incident on the basis of Article 82 GDPR in the amount of PLN 20,000 (€4,247). First, the District Court of Warsaw-Praga (the Court) confirmed that the incident constituted a 'personal data breach' within the meaning of Article 4(12) GDPR. It also recalled that any person who suffered
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case II C 1228/19 in PL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case II C 1228/19 - Poland (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: