Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case 3 Bs 146/23 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2023)

Court Ruling
DPA VGHamburg29 November 2023Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A student candidate at the University of Hamburg challenged the requirement to provide his date of birth for election candidacy. The court ruled that the university's request was valid for identification purposes, emphasizing that personal data processing must comply with legal requirements. This case illustrates the balance between data protection and necessary identification.

What happened

The University of Hamburg required a candidate's date of birth for election registration, which the candidate contested as unnecessary.

Who was affected

The student candidate who filed a lawsuit against the university regarding the date of birth requirement.

What the authority found

The court upheld the university's requirement for the date of birth, stating it was necessary for proper identification of candidates.

Why this matters

This ruling reinforces that personal data can be required for legitimate purposes, such as identification in elections. It serves as a reminder for organizations to clearly justify data collection practices.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5 GDPR
Art. 6 GDPR
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(e) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(GDPR)
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 6(1)(e) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 4 HmbDSG
Decision AuthorityOVG Hamburg
Reviewed AuthorityVG Hamburg (Germany)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject as a data subject in this case, was a candidate for the election of the students' parliament at the University of Hamburg. Upon signing up for candidacy the data subject was requested to disclose his date of birth in the candidacy registration form, but he claimed this to be unnecessary and filed his candidacy without providing his date of birth. The University rejected his candidacy on this basis, claiming that all candidacies must also entail the candidates' date of birth. The data subject decided to file suit against the member organisation of the University with the Administrative Court of Hamburg (Verwaltungsgericht Hamburg, VG Hamburg) The controller is the University of Hamburg, a legal entity under public law of the City of Hamburg. The Hamburg University Election Act (Wahlordnung, WahlO) stipulates that to be able to run for elections, every candidate must provide their full name, student number, date of birth, current home address and an email address. In its submissions, the controller argued that processing the date of birth of candidates was necessary for the purpose of identifying them beyond doubt and ensuring that the candidates were of legal age. On 11 February 2023, the VG Hamburg, in the first instance, held that the data subject's candidacy registration form was incomplete because the required date of birth was missing and that this requirement does not raise any data protection concerns. Hence, the court took the view that he had not submitted a complete form in a timely manner and therefore could not run for election. The data subject thus decided to appeal the decision to the Higher Administrative Court of Hamburg (Oberverwaltungsgericht Hamburg, OVG Hamburg). The OVG Hamburg first of all held that the GDPR applies because the date of birth of a data subject constitutes personal data and its use in the context of the election is to be considered data processing. Further, the OVG held that the only legal basis for such da

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 3 Bs 146/23 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

29 November 2023

Authority

DPA VGHamburg

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 3 Bs 146/23 - Germany (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: