- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case 3 Bs 146/23 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2023)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A student candidate at the University of Hamburg challenged the requirement to provide his date of birth for election candidacy. The court ruled that the university's request was valid for identification purposes, emphasizing that personal data processing must comply with legal requirements. This case illustrates the balance between data protection and necessary identification.
What happened
The University of Hamburg required a candidate's date of birth for election registration, which the candidate contested as unnecessary.
Who was affected
The student candidate who filed a lawsuit against the university regarding the date of birth requirement.
What the authority found
The court upheld the university's requirement for the date of birth, stating it was necessary for proper identification of candidates.
Why this matters
This ruling reinforces that personal data can be required for legitimate purposes, such as identification in elections. It serves as a reminder for organizations to clearly justify data collection practices.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject as a data subject in this case, was a candidate for the election of the students' parliament at the University of Hamburg. Upon signing up for candidacy the data subject was requested to disclose his date of birth in the candidacy registration form, but he claimed this to be unnecessary and filed his candidacy without providing his date of birth. The University rejected his candidacy on this basis, claiming that all candidacies must also entail the candidates' date of birth. The data subject decided to file suit against the member organisation of the University with the Administrative Court of Hamburg (Verwaltungsgericht Hamburg, VG Hamburg) The controller is the University of Hamburg, a legal entity under public law of the City of Hamburg. The Hamburg University Election Act (Wahlordnung, WahlO) stipulates that to be able to run for elections, every candidate must provide their full name, student number, date of birth, current home address and an email address. In its submissions, the controller argued that processing the date of birth of candidates was necessary for the purpose of identifying them beyond doubt and ensuring that the candidates were of legal age. On 11 February 2023, the VG Hamburg, in the first instance, held that the data subject's candidacy registration form was incomplete because the required date of birth was missing and that this requirement does not raise any data protection concerns. Hence, the court took the view that he had not submitted a complete form in a timely manner and therefore could not run for election. The data subject thus decided to appeal the decision to the Higher Administrative Court of Hamburg (Oberverwaltungsgericht Hamburg, OVG Hamburg). The OVG Hamburg first of all held that the GDPR applies because the date of birth of a data subject constitutes personal data and its use in the context of the election is to be considered data processing. Further, the OVG held that the only legal basis for such da
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 3 Bs 146/23 in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
29 November 2023
Authority
DPA VGHamburg
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 3 Bs 146/23 - Germany (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: