- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case W298 2296144-1 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2025)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Austrian court ruled that a credit information agency must delete payment history data after it has been settled. This is significant because it reinforces the right to erasure under privacy laws. Companies must ensure they do not keep unnecessary data longer than needed.
What happened
The court upheld a decision requiring the credit agency to delete payment history data that was no longer necessary.
Who was affected
The individual whose payment history data was retained by the credit information agency despite the debts being settled.
What the authority found
The court found that the credit agency violated the right to erasure by not deleting data that was no longer necessary for processing.
Why this matters
This ruling stresses the importance of data minimization and the right to erasure. Companies should regularly review their data retention practices to comply with privacy laws.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.
No issues were reported by that automated check.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The controller is a credit information agency that collects information from different sources to calculate an individual’s creditworthiness. This information is accessed by third parties. The controller contractually obliges its contractual partners (such as debt collection agencies) to inform it (as a credit information agency) about payment defaults of data subjects. The debt collection agency informed the data subject of the transfer of their data to the controller in 2020, and since then, the controller stored entries on the payment history data of the data subject. The payments were later settled and the entries reflected this. However, the controller refused to delete them when the data subject requested their erasure. The data subject argued that their economic progress was impaired as a result, and brought a complaint to the DPA. The controller argued that the processed data was still necessary for credit checking purposes. The DPA upheld the complaint in June 2024, and stated that the controller had violated the data subject’s right to erasure. Furthermore, the controller was not permitted to store payment history data beyond its settlement, and was required to delete the entries. According to the DPA, further processing of the data was unnecessary, because the claims had already been settled in full. The controller appealed the decision to the Federal Administrative Court, arguing that this payment history was necessary to calculate reliable information about an individual’s creditworthiness. The Court first stated that the controller could only rely on legitimate interests (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR) as a valid legal basis for processing, meaning national law (such as Section 152 of the Industrial Code) or other legal bases under Article 6(1) GDPR were not valid. The Court then examined the case law on balancing the legal interests of data subjects and credit information agencies. Jurisprudence of the Court and the Administrative Court have consistent
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case W298 2296144-1 in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
24 February 2025
Authority
DPA BVwG
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W298 2296144-1 - Austria (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: