Res-Gastro M. Gaweł Sp. k. – €54,819 Fine (Poland, 2024)

€54,819Urząd Ochrony Danych Osobowych29 April 2024Poland
final
Fine

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The controller is a company which operates restaurants. On 26 July 2023, the controller notified the DPA about a data breach occurred on 19 July 2023: an employee had lost a flash drive containing unencrypted data about another employee, such as their address, date of birth, passport, picture and salary data. Moreover, some financial data were stored in the drive in an encrypted way. On 26 September 2023 the DPA initiated an ex officio proceeding. The controller stated that it had instructed all employees to encrypt their files when stored in an external flash drive and that the loss occurred in the workplace premises. Firstly, the DPA recalled that, according to Article 5(1)(f) GDPR personal data must be processed in a manner that ensures adequate security of personal data by means of appropriate technical or organizational measures. According to the DPA, a concretization of this principle is Article 24(1) GDPR, which obliges the controller to implement appropriate technical measures and organizational to carry out processing in accordance with the GDPR. Moreover, the DPA pointed out that the controller must also comply with the obligation set by Article 32 GDPR. It noted that this article obliges the controller to carry out a 2-step analysis: firstly, it must determine the risks involved in the processing of personal data and, secondly, determine what technical and organizational measures will be appropriate to ensure a degree of security corresponding to that risk. The DPA observed that the risk assessment analysis conducted by the controller did include the possibility of a flash drive theft, but not of a loss of it. Therefore, the DPA held that the controller failed to take into account all possible risks associated with the use of external data carriers by employees. Moreover, the DPA focused on the fact that, even if the controller had considered this risk, it did not implement sufficient security measures. The DPA acknowledged that the controller had ins

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 5(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 24(1) GDPR
Art. 32(1) GDPR
Art. 32(2) GDPR
Full Legal Summary

The controller is a company which operates restaurants. On 26 July 2023, the controller notified the DPA about a data breach occurred on 19 July 2023: an employee had lost a flash drive containing unencrypted data about another employee, such as their address, date of birth, passport, picture and salary data. Moreover, some financial data were stored in the drive in an encrypted way. On 26 September 2023 the DPA initiated an ex officio proceeding. The controller stated that it had instructed all employees to encrypt their files when stored in an external flash drive and that the loss occurred in the workplace premises. Firstly, the DPA recalled that, according to Article 5(1)(f) GDPR personal data must be processed in a manner that ensures adequate security of personal data by means of appropriate technical or organizational measures. According to the DPA, a concretization of this principle is Article 24(1) GDPR, which obliges the controller to implement appropriate technical measures and organizational to carry out processing in accordance with the GDPR. Moreover, the DPA pointed out that the controller must also comply with the obligation set by Article 32 GDPR. It noted that this article obliges the controller to carry out a 2-step analysis: firstly, it must determine the risks involved in the processing of personal data and, secondly, determine what technical and organizational measures will be appropriate to ensure a degree of security corresponding to that risk. The DPA observed that the risk assessment analysis conducted by the controller did include the possibility of a flash drive theft, but not of a loss of it. Therefore, the DPA held that the controller failed to take into account all possible risks associated with the use of external data carriers by employees. Moreover, the DPA focused on the fact that, even if the controller had considered this risk, it did not implement sufficient security measures. The DPA acknowledged that the controller had ins

Details

Fine Date

29 April 2024

Authority

Urząd Ochrony Danych Osobowych

Fine Amount

€54,819

238,345 PLN

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-8050

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Res-Gastro M. Gaweł Sp. k. - Poland (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: