Enforcing jurisdiction
Estonia · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
No confirmed legal basis recorded.
Privacy topics

AKI – Court Ruling (Estonia, 2025)

Court Ruling
Andmekaitse Inspektsioon13 October 2025Estonia
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled against a former entrepreneur who wanted to erase personal data from news articles about them. The court decided that the articles could remain published because they served a public interest. This case highlights the balance between privacy rights and freedom of expression, showing that public figures have less control over their personal data in the media.

What happened

The court rejected a request to erase personal data from articles about the individual, ruling that the information was published for journalistic purposes.

Who was affected

The former entrepreneur who sought to have their personal data removed from online articles.

What the authority found

The court found that the publication of the articles was lawful for journalistic purposes and served the public interest.

Why this matters

This ruling illustrates the challenges public figures face in protecting their privacy. It sets a precedent that may affect how personal data is treated in media coverage, especially for those in the public eye.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 17(1) GDPR
Art. 17(3) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 17(1) GDPR
Art. 17(3) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 4 IKS
Decision AuthorityTallinna Halduskohus
Reviewed AuthorityAKI (Estonia)

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject is a former entrepreneur who appeared in Estonian news articles, including tabloids, due to being photographed alongside celebrities and sharing such photos on social media. Among other thing, the data subject maintained a channel on the Youtube platform promoting their own products. The data subject filed a complaint with the Estonian DPA (AKI) on 29 April 2024 requesting an intervention for the erasure of personal data from a number of articles available online, published by several media outlets (the controllers). In addition, on 2 May 2024, the data subject filed a subsequent complaint with the DPA, asking for intervention for their request to Google (the controller) to de-index the same articles. The DPA rejected the complaints based on the findings that the processing of personal data in the published articles was lawful for journalistic purposes under Article 4 Estonian Personal Data Protection Act (IKS) since the data subject was a public figure and there was public interest in the information, including in the availability of archives. The data subject appealed the decision of the DPA to the Tallinn Administrative Court (Tallinna Halduskohus) seeking to have the DPA decision annulled and their complaint re-examined. The Court noted that the articles listed by the data subject in the two complaints made to the DPA overlapped and therefore decided to analyse them together. The Court found that the DPA had to weigh two rights against each other in reaching a conclusion regarding the complaint. On one hand, the continued publication of the articles containing the personal data of the data subject may infringe upon their right to privacy and the protection of personal data. On the other hand, the anonymisation of personal data in the articles may cause an infringement upon the right to freedom of expression and information. Firstly, the Court referred to the criteria used in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case of [https:

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for AKI in EE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

13 October 2025

Authority

Andmekaitse Inspektsioon

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. AKI - Estonia (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: