- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Child Protection Board – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2025)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A court partially upheld a data subject's request to delete personal data from a child protection council, granting symbolic compensation for delays in deleting criminal investigation data. This case matters because it highlights the importance of timely data deletion and the rights of individuals regarding their personal data.
What happened
A court ruled that the child protection council must delete certain personal data but upheld the necessity of retaining other data.
Who was affected
The data subject who requested the deletion of their proceedings-related data was affected.
What the authority found
The court found that the council acted properly in retaining some data for public interest but was slow in deleting others.
Why this matters
This case underscores the need for organizations to manage personal data responsibly and promptly, reinforcing the rights of individuals to have their data deleted when appropriate.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Review needed — 19 March 2026.
Processing notes: amount discrepancy.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject requested the deletion of all his proceedings-related data stored by the child protection council. The council granted the request as to criminal investigations, but not to child protection investigations. The data subject filed a lawsuit with the Court, affirming the controller did not provide sufficient grounds for not deleting child protection investigation data. Moreover, this was accompanied by a claim for damages for deleting criminal investigation data with too big of a delay. The Court partially upheld the complaint. It agreed with the controller that child protection related data fell within the exception of Article 17(3)(b) GDPR, as it amounted to processing carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority under Article 6(1)(e) GDPR. Provisions of national law sufficiently demonstrate the controller’s necessity to process personal data for the performance of its tasks in the public interest. Moreover, the controller adequately demonstrated that they were timely in the deletion of the criminal files, within a month from the request by the data subject. As such, no administrative fine was imposed by the Court. Still, the removal took place more than one year after proceedings, allowing for other government entities to consult the documents, thus causing distress in the data subject. Essentially, the controller was not proactive in the deletion of data about the criminal proceedings. Due to this, the data subject was entitled to symbolic compensation of €125.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Child Protection Board in NL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
15 September 2025
Authority
DPA RbNoord-Nederland
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Child Protection Board - Netherlands (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: