- Enforcing jurisdiction
- France · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Amazon France Logistique – Court Ruling (France, 2025)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A French court ruled in favor of Amazon France Logistique, allowing the company to continue using certain employee performance indicators. The court found that processing these indicators was lawful under GDPR. This decision clarifies how companies can balance data use for management while respecting employee privacy.
What happened
The court upheld that Amazon France Logistique processed employee performance indicators lawfully under GDPR.
Who was affected
Amazon employees whose performance data was analyzed were affected.
What the authority found
The court ruled that the processing of performance indicators was justified under legitimate interest, but the company violated data minimization principles by collecting excessive data.
Why this matters
This ruling illustrates the complexities of data processing in the workplace and sets a precedent for how companies can use performance data while still adhering to privacy laws. Businesses should evaluate their data collection practices to ensure compliance.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Review needed — 17 March 2026.
Processing notes: amount discrepancy.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
In 2023 the French DPA (CNIL) found that, among other things, Amazon France Logistique (the controller) processed three indicators related to the work performance of their employees without a legal basis. The DPA took this finding into consideration when deciding on the fine issued to the controller, i.e. €32 million. The controller contested the decision. The Supreme Administrative Court found that the three indicators (i.e. the stow machine gun indicator, the idle time indicator, and the latency time indicator) were processed lawfully under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR (i.e. legitimate interest). The Court noted that the purpose of the indicators was the management of stock and order (stock machine gun indicator) and to flag interruptions in activity that cannot be detected by the other indicators used in order to identify their causes (idle time indicator and latency time indicator). The Court also noted that the right to private life of the employees was not excessively infringed upon by the processing of these indicators. In contrast, the Court maintained the DPA’s decision regarding the controller's violation of Article 5 GDPR, specifically the principle of data minimisation and accountability, by collecting a disproportionate amount of data and storing them for 31 days without showing the need for such processing. Therefore, the Court found that the controller processed the indicators based on a legitimate interest under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR and reduced the initial fine from €32 million to €15 million.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Amazon France Logistique in FR
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
23 December 2025
Authority
Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Amazon France Logistique - France (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: