Enforcing jurisdiction
Croatia · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case K-648/2025-2 – Court Ruling (Croatia, 2025)

Court Ruling
DPA OpsudZadar25 November 2025Croatia
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court sentenced an insurance agent to six months in prison for accessing client data without permission during his employment termination. This ruling underscores the seriousness of unauthorized data access and the legal consequences that can follow such actions. Companies must enforce strict access controls to protect sensitive information.

What happened

An insurance agent accessed company data without authorization after his access was revoked during his termination notice period.

Who was affected

At least 334 clients whose personal data was accessed and sent without authorization by the insurance agent.

What the authority found

The court found that the agent committed a criminal offense by accessing personal data without permission, violating privacy laws.

Why this matters

This case highlights the importance of safeguarding personal data and the legal repercussions of unauthorized access. Companies should implement strong security measures to prevent similar incidents.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityOpć. sud Zadar

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 17 March 2026.

Processing notes: national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The defendant, an insurance agent at Croatia Osiguranje d.d., had his access to company business applications revoked during his employment termination notice period in September 2021. Despite this restriction and without authorization from his employer or clients, he used the login credentials of another employee to repeatedly access internal sales applications. He then sent 41 emails containing 848 documents that included the insurance policies and personal data (names, addresses, personal identification numbers, birth dates, and phone numbers) of at least 334 clients. He first sent the data to his official work email and then forwarded it to his private email. The prosecution alleged that this conduct violated the GDPR, the Croatian GDPR Implementation Act, and internal company access rules and this this constituted unauthorized use of personal data and unauthorized access to computer systems under Croatian criminal law. The court held that the defendant committed a criminal offense against privacy. Because the defendant intentionally accessed and used personal data without permission and without a valid legal basis under Article 6(1) GDPR, the court held that he committed the criminal offense of violation of privacy under Article 146(1) of the Croatian Criminal Code. The court sentenced HIM to a prison term of three months. Additionally, the court found that the defendant knowingly accessed the employer’s computer systems without authorisation. The court held that this conduct constituted a criminal offense against computer systems, programs, and data under Article 266(1) of the Croatian Criminal Code because it involved intentional interference with computer systems which the defendant had no lawful access. For this the court sentenced the defendant to a prison term of four months. The court combined the sentences into a single six-month prison term. It then imposed a suspended sentence, so the prison term would not be executed if the defendant did not commit another crime within a one-year probation period. The court explained that it could revoke the suspended sentence if the defendant committed another offense that resulted in imprisonment. The court also ordered him to pay €30 in procedural costs. It held that this sanction was sufficient to prevent future violations and to fulfill the aims of punishment under Croatian law.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case K-648/2025-2 in HR

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

25 November 2025

Authority

DPA OpsudZadar

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case K-648/2025-2 - Croatia (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: