Monsanto Company – €400,000 Fine (France, 2021)

€400,000Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés26 August 2021France
final
Fine

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

In May 2019, several media outlets revealed that the Monsanto company was processing personal data of more than 200 public figures like politicians, journalists and scientists involved in the glyphosate debate. At the same time, the French DPA CNIL received seven complaints from data subjects whose personal information was included in Monsanto's filing system. The investigation revealed that (i) the filing system had been created on behalf of Monsanto by several companies specialized in public relations and lobbying; (ii) the filing system contained different information about the data subjects including job description, professional email address, mobile phone number, and sometimes Twitter account. Furthermore, (iv) a rating was given to every data subject, to estimate their influence and their support to Monsanto's activities. = The DPA found that the creation of contact files for the purpose of lobbying is not illegal in itself. However, the DPA found that the company had violated Article 14 GDPR for not having provided the data subjects with the mandatory information as soon as possible. Indeed, even if consent from those public figures was not necessary, they still had to be informed, so they could exercise their rights and especially their right to object. The DPA found that data subject were informed of the existence of the filing system only in 2019, after revelations in the media, even though the Monsanto company had all of their contact information. The DPA also reminded that the fact of not informing the data subject of the existence of a processing harms the exercise of their others rights guaranteed under the GDPR. = The DPA found that the company had violated Article 28 GDPR. As a controller, Monsanto had to lead by a judicial document the processing realised by its processor, especially to guarantee security measures. The DPA found that no contract between the companies contained the terms provided by Article 28(3) GDPR.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 14(GDPR)
Art. 28(GDPR)
Art. 28(3) GDPR
Full Legal Summary

In May 2019, several media outlets revealed that the Monsanto company was processing personal data of more than 200 public figures like politicians, journalists and scientists involved in the glyphosate debate. At the same time, the French DPA CNIL received seven complaints from data subjects whose personal information was included in Monsanto's filing system. The investigation revealed that (i) the filing system had been created on behalf of Monsanto by several companies specialized in public relations and lobbying; (ii) the filing system contained different information about the data subjects including job description, professional email address, mobile phone number, and sometimes Twitter account. Furthermore, (iv) a rating was given to every data subject, to estimate their influence and their support to Monsanto's activities. = The DPA found that the creation of contact files for the purpose of lobbying is not illegal in itself. However, the DPA found that the company had violated Article 14 GDPR for not having provided the data subjects with the mandatory information as soon as possible. Indeed, even if consent from those public figures was not necessary, they still had to be informed, so they could exercise their rights and especially their right to object. The DPA found that data subject were informed of the existence of the filing system only in 2019, after revelations in the media, even though the Monsanto company had all of their contact information. The DPA also reminded that the fact of not informing the data subject of the existence of a processing harms the exercise of their others rights guaranteed under the GDPR. = The DPA found that the company had violated Article 28 GDPR. As a controller, Monsanto had to lead by a judicial document the processing realised by its processor, especially to guarantee security measures. The DPA found that no contract between the companies contained the terms provided by Article 28(3) GDPR.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for Monsanto Company in FR

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Fine Date

26 August 2021

Authority

Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés

Fine Amount

€400,000

Enforcement Tracker ID

ETid-776

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-3690

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Monsanto Company - France (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: