GDPR Fines & Penalties 2026
Search GDPR fines, penalties, warnings, orders, bans, and investigations across Europe by country, action type, GDPR article, and violation category.
Frequently Asked Questions About GDPR Enforcement
Q:What types of GDPR enforcement actions exist?
GDPR enforcement actions include monetary fines (the most publicised), formal warnings, reprimands, processing bans, data erasure orders, and compliance orders. DPAs can also impose temporary or permanent limitations on data processing. Fines can reach up to EUR 20 million or 4% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher, under Article 83(5) GDPR.
Q:How are GDPR fines calculated by data protection authorities?
DPAs consider factors listed in Article 83(2) GDPR: nature, gravity, and duration of the infringement; intentional or negligent character; actions taken to mitigate damage; degree of responsibility; previous infringements; degree of cooperation; categories of personal data affected; how the infringement became known; and adherence to approved codes of conduct or certification mechanisms.
Q:Can GDPR fines be appealed?
Yes, GDPR fines can be appealed through national courts. Many high-profile fines have been challenged. The appeals process varies by country. Some fines have been reduced on appeal (e.g., British Airways' fine was reduced from GBP 183 million to GBP 20 million), while others have been upheld or even increased.
Browse case links on this page
GDPR Enforcement Actions (247 total)
- A company associate (plaintiff) (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Mar 2021
- Mrs Y (The Complainant) (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Mar 2021
- [...] (Germany) – complaint upheld – Mar 2021
- Akureyri Hospital (Iceland) – complaint upheld – Mar 2021
- Bland.is (Iceland) – complaint upheld – Mar 2021
- Cyprus Association of Automotive Engineer Assessors (Cyprus) – complaint upheld – Mar 2021
- First Choice Selection Services Limited (United Kingdom) – complaint upheld – Mar 2021
- Corina A*** (Austria) – complaint upheld – Feb 2021
- Security company (name N/A at the moment) (Croatia) – complaint upheld – Feb 2021
- AYUNTAMIENTO DE GATA (Spain) – complaint upheld – Feb 2021
- Telenet (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Feb 2021 | Cannot Withdraw Cookie Consent, Misleading Banner Messaging, No Granular Cookie Choice, No Reject Button, Pre-ticked Consent Boxes, Reject Harder Than Accept, Unclear Cookie Information
- Barclays Bank Plc (Italy) – complaint upheld – Jan 2021
- Helsingin kaupunki (City of Helsinki) (Finland) – complaint upheld – Jan 2021
- FACUA - Asociación de Consumidores y Usuarios en Acción (Spain) – complaint upheld – Jan 2021 | No Reject Button, Third-Party Cookies Without Consent, Unclear Cookie Information
- Associació Catalana per la Participació Política (Spain) – complaint upheld – Jan 2021
- Brigitte A. (complainant) (Austria) – complaint upheld – Jan 2021
- AYUNTAMIENTO DE TOBAR (Spain) – complaint upheld – Dec 2020
- FPS Finance (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Dec 2020 | Misleading Banner Messaging, Pre-ticked Consent Boxes, Third-Party Cookies Without Consent
- Groupon International Limited (Ireland) – complaint upheld – Dec 2020
- Skeljung hf. (Iceland) – complaint upheld – Nov 2020
- ABIS GmbH (Germany) – complaint upheld – Nov 2020
- Dr. Uwe A*** (complainant) (Austria) – complaint upheld – Nov 2020
- Ayuntamiento de Mejorada del Campo (Spain) – complaint upheld – Nov 2020
- Ryanair DAC (Ireland) – complaint upheld – Nov 2020
- Datatilsynet (Norway) – complaint upheld – Nov 2020