Mrs XX - natural person – Violation Found (Italy, 2023)
A private individual in Italy was investigated for installing a surveillance system that recorded public areas without proper notice. This is important because it raises questions about privacy and the use of surveillance in residential areas.
What happened
The individual installed a surveillance system that captured footage of a nearby playground and public square.
Who was affected
People using the public areas near the individual's property, including children playing in the playground.
What the authority found
The Italian data protection authority opened an investigation into the individual's surveillance practices due to potential privacy violations.
Why this matters
This case serves as a reminder for individuals to consider privacy implications when using surveillance systems. It emphasizes the need for transparency and respect for public spaces.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
On 6 July 2021, a station of the Italian Carabinieri reported to the DPA that the private party in this proceeding (the controller), installed a surveillance system on the external wall of her property. Reportedly, the surveillance system in question was recording the public area in front of the controller’s property, including a nearby playground and a public square. Pursuant to [https://www.garanteprivacy.it/documents/10160/0/Codice+in+materia+di+protezione+dei+dati+personali+%28Testo+coordinato%29 Article 157 of the Italian Privacy Code], the DPA opened a preliminary investigation. During the investigation carried out on 2 March 2023, the DPA noted that the video surveillance system was made up of two recording devices. The first camera, a 360-degree camera, was active and could record images as well as audio and speak through the microphone. The camera was positioned right above the entrance door, and the controller controlled the camera through a smartphone application. The second camera was connected but not active, and it was looking over the driveway that leads to the entrance of the building. In relation to the viewing angle of the cameras, the controller declared that the first camera, due to its characteristics, could also frame part of the nearby playground, although it was not in her interest to do so. She further clarified that the video surveillance had been installed due to incidents of damage or explicit threats received and that she wanted to utilise the footage for the purpose of lodging complaints. On 15 June 2023, the controller took measures to replace the first camera with a fixed camera model pointed only towards the entrance of her property to bring the processing in compliance with the GDPR. In the outcome of the investigation, the DPA first considered whether the GDPR applied to the data processing carried out by the controller. In principle, under Article 2(2)(c) GDPR, the use of video surveillance systems by natural persons in their p
Outcome
Violation Found
The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for Mrs XX - natural person in IT
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Decision Date
12 October 2023
Authority
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-6561About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Mrs XX - natural person - Italy (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: