Claimant: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. (vzbv) – Court Ruling (Germany, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA LGRostock15 September 2020Germany
final
ePrivacy
Court Ruling

A German court ruled that a website used illegal cookie practices by having pre-ticked boxes and loading third-party cookies without consent. This is important because it shows that companies must be transparent and obtain clear consent from users before tracking them online.

What happened

The court found that the website used pre-ticked consent boxes and loaded third-party cookies without user consent.

Who was affected

Website visitors who were tracked by the site's cookies without their explicit consent.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the website violated data protection rules by not providing clear information and obtaining proper consent for cookies.

Why this matters

This case highlights the need for websites to improve their cookie consent practices. Companies should ensure that users are fully informed and give clear consent before any tracking occurs.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 7(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 44(GDPR)
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 4(11) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(2) GDPR
Art. 4(11) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 7(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 14(GDPR)
Art. 21(GDPR)
Art. 24(GDPR)
Art. 26(GDPR)
Art. 28(GDPR)
Art. 44(GDPR)
Art. 45(GDPR)
Art. 95(GDPR)

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

National Law Articles

AI-identified

§ 15(3) Telemediengesetz
Decision AuthorityLandgericht Rostock
Source verified 11 April 2026
articles corrected
national law identified
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The German consumer organisation Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. (vzbv, the claimant) filed a lawsuit against advocado GmbH (advocado, the defendant), a German-based company that runs an online platform where attorneys can offer their services. The defendant's website had used a cookie banner with pre-ticked boxes for the use of marketing and analytics cookies. This included the use of tools such as Google Analytics that entail a data transfer to third countries. The claimant argued that the data processing in connection with the placed cookies was unlawful under Article 6(1) GDPR: A user's consent under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR could not be considered valid under Articles 4(11) and 7 GDPR, especially since the boxes were pre-ticked. Moreover, the claimant claimed that the defendant had violated Articles 5(1)(a), 13/14, 26 and 44 et seqq. GDPR as it had failed to properly inform users of the scope of intended processing activities, joint controllers and international data transfers in connection with the use of cookies. The defendant stated that it had based the use of cookies on legitimate interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR until the CJEU issued its decision C-673/17 on 01.10.2019 ("Planet 49"). Afterwards, the defandent argued that they changed the legal basis for processing to consent under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, which it considered valid under Articles 4(11) and 7 GDPR. The defendant also stated that it was the sole controller for the processing activities - there were no joint controllers involved, only processors. (Furthermore, the claimant had also argued that some provisions in the defendant's general terms and conditions were unlawful from a civil law / consumer protection law perspective. This will not be discussed further in this summary.) *Was it necessary to ask for the users' consent under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR or could the processing activities in connection with the use of marketin

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Violations (4)

Pre-ticked Consent Boxes
high

Cookie consent checkboxes are pre-selected by default, violating the requirement for active, affirmative consent.

Art. 4(11) GDPR

Cookies Placed Before Consent
critical

Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.

Art. 6(1) GDPR

Third-Party Cookies Without Consent
critical

Third-party tracking cookies or scripts are loaded without obtaining prior user consent.

Art. 13, 14 GDPR

Unclear Cookie Information
high

The cookie banner or cookie policy provides vague, incomplete, or unclear information about what cookies are used and why.

Art. 12, 13 GDPR

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Claimant: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. (vzbv) in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

15 September 2020

Authority

DPA LGRostock

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified
Cookie relevance: 100%

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Claimant: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. (vzbv) - Germany (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: