Google LLC – Court Ruling (France, 2021)
France's data protection authority ruled that Google LLC did not provide clear information about its cookie practices. This matters because it highlights the importance of transparency and consent when using cookies on websites. Companies need to ensure their cookie banners are easy to understand and allow users to reject cookies as easily as they can accept them.
What happened
Google tracked users with cookies on its French website without providing clear information or a simple way to reject them.
Who was affected
Website visitors using Google.fr who were tracked by cookies without proper consent.
What the authority found
The authority found that Google lacked valid legal grounds for processing personal data related to cookies, violating GDPR and ePrivacy rules.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes that companies must clearly inform users about cookie usage and make it easy to opt out. Website operators should review their cookie consent practices to avoid similar issues.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
National Law Articles
On December, 7 2020, the French DPA imposed a financial penalty of 60 Million euros fine against Google LLC and a 40 million euros against Google Ireland Limited in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and ePrivacy Directive 2002/58/EC, for lack of transparency, inadequate information and lack of valid consent regarding for violating the regulation on cookies while operating the website [https://google.fr google.fr]. The sanction was accompanied by an order to comply with [https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/article_lc/LEGIARTI000037813978 article 82 of the French Law on data protection] (Law Informatique et Libertés), under three months on penalty of a €100,000 fine per day of delay. The companies appealed to the Conseil d’État in interim procedure against the CNIL's decision, arguing that the French DPA was not the competent authority because it was not the lead supervisory authority for Google LLC or Google Ireland Limited. Is the CNIL territorially competent to investigate and sanction a company for violating the information principle when depositing cookies if it is not the lead supervisory authority of the company? The CNIL considered that Google does have EU headquarters in Ireland, but that this Irish entity ‘did not have a decision making power’ in relation to the relevant cross-border data processing activities to which the complaints related. For that reason the CNIL decided that the One Stop Shop mechanism did not apply and that the CNIL, like any other European supervisory authority, was therefore competent to make a decision. The Conseil d’État rejected the request made by Google and ruled that the French DPA was territorially competent on this matter even though it is not the lead supervisory authority. The court stated that Article 82 of the Law Informatique et Libertés was a transposition of Article 5(3) ePrivacy Directive 2002/58/EC into French Law when dealing with cookies and that the CNIL is charged with enforcing th
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Violations (6)
Cookie banner does not provide a clear reject/refuse all button at the same level as the accept button.
Art. 7 GDPR
Refusing cookies requires more clicks or steps than accepting them, or the reject option is less visually prominent.
Art. 7 GDPR
Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Third-party tracking cookies or scripts are loaded without obtaining prior user consent.
Art. 13, 14 GDPR
The cookie banner or cookie policy provides vague, incomplete, or unclear information about what cookies are used and why.
Art. 12, 13 GDPR
The cookie banner uses misleading language to trick or pressure users into accepting cookies (dark patterns).
Art. 7 GDPR
Related Cases (5)
Other cases involving Google LLC in FR
Court Ruling
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
Ruling Date
4 March 2021
Authority
Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-court-3227About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Google LLC - France (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: