DPA case 10057346 – Violation Found (Italy, 2024)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Italian clinic reported a data breach where a midwife accidentally sent sensitive patient information to the wrong person. The data protection authority found that the breach was due to human error and did not cause any harm, so they decided to reprimand the clinic instead of imposing a fine. This case shows the importance of quick action and cooperation in handling data breaches.
What happened
A midwife mistakenly emailed sensitive patient information to another patient.
Who was affected
The couple undergoing IVF treatment whose personal data was disclosed was affected.
What the authority found
The authority determined that the clinic's actions were sufficient to address the breach and did not warrant a fine.
Why this matters
This ruling indicates that prompt reporting and cooperation can mitigate the consequences of a data breach. Clinics and healthcare providers should ensure staff are trained to handle sensitive data carefully.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
No issues were reported by that automated check.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
A clinic, the controller, notified the Italian DPA about a personal data breach, as per Article 33 GDPR. The data breach concerned the wrongful disclosure of a form containing name, surname, date and place of birth of one couple undergoing IVF treatment to another patient. Specifically, a midwife sent an email containing this form to another IVF patient, who replied within one hour to receive an empty form. The midwife promptly requested the deletion of the mistakenly-sent form and informed the controller about what happened. The patient who mistakenly received the form confirmed the deletion of the form to the controller. The controller considered the information in the form emailed to the wrong patient to constitute sensitive data under Article 9 GDPR. The controller argued that the violation was due to mere human error and that the midwife attended a privacy course from an external consultancy agency. Moreover, as the receiving patient notified the controller and deleted the wrongfully sent file within two hours, the effects of the data breach were limited. The controller moreover adopted the appropriate safeguards and technical measures required under Article 32(1) and (2) GDPR, which in the case at hand were not in place because the form was supposed to be empty. The DPA considered that the episode was an isolated one that resulted in no harm, as confirmed by the lack of the data subject´s complaint. Moreover, the form was promptly deleted and the necessary safeguards to avoid further data breaches were immediately put into place. The controller additionally notified the breach right away and was extremely cooperative throughout the preliminary investigation. Thus, the DPA found it sufficient and appropriate to reprimand the controller.
Outcome
Violation Found
The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 10057346 in IT
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Decision Date
17 July 2024
Authority
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-8615About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 10057346 - Italy (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: