Enforcing jurisdiction
Poland · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case DKN.5131.12.2022 – Violation Found (Poland, 2026)

Violation Found
Urząd Ochrony Danych Osobowych11 June 2026Poland
final
Violation Found

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A provincial specialist hospital in Poland received a reprimand after a data breach exposed patient information. This is significant because it highlights the need for organizations to secure sensitive data. The case serves as a reminder for all healthcare providers to strengthen their data protection measures.

What happened

The hospital's employee email account was hacked, exposing personal data of around 200 patients.

Who was affected

Patients whose personal information was compromised in the data breach.

What the authority found

The authority found that the hospital violated multiple GDPR rules regarding data security and processing.

Why this matters

This case underscores the importance of implementing strong security measures to protect sensitive data. It serves as a warning to other healthcare providers to prioritize data protection.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 5(2) GDPR
Art. 24(1) GDPR
Art. 25(1) GDPR
Art. 28(1) GDPR
Art. 28(3)(c) GDPR
Art. 32(1) GDPR
Art. 32(2) GDPR
Art. 35(1) GDPR
Art. 35(3) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 5(2) GDPR
Art. 24(1) GDPR
Art. 25(1) GDPR
Art. 28(1) GDPR
Art. 32(1) GDPR
Art. 35(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Entities Involved

Provincial Specialist Hospital0(controller)
External Service Provider0(processor)

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, entity split needed.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The email account of an employee at a provincial specialist hospital (the controller) was hacked in December 2021. The compromised email account contained e.g. names, addresses, phone numbers, vaccination appointments, and national identification numbers of approximately 200 patients (the data subjects). The email account was hosted on the servers of an external service provider (the processor). The controller notified the supervisory authority of this data breach at the end of December 2021. The DPA started an investigation regarding potential GDPR infringements by the controller and the processor in March 2022. The DPA issued the controller a reprimand for multiple GDPR violations. First, it held that the controller had violated Article 28(1) GDPR: while the controller had concluded a data processing agreement with the processor, it had failed to verify whether the processor provided sufficient guarantees to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures. Second, the DPA found that the controller had infringed Articles 24(1), 25(1), and 32(1) and 32(2) GDPR by failing to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure the security of processing via the email system. The DPA took into account that the controller had not taken any measures to minimise the risks identified. In addition, the DPA pointed out that the breach involved sensitive health data, and the passwords used by the controller did not meet the usual security requirements. As a consequence of the previous violations, the controller had infringed the principles of integrity, confidentiality and accountability laid down in Articles 5(1)(f) and 5(2) GDPR as well. Finally, the DPA found a violation of Article 35(1) GDPR in conjunction with Article 35(3) GDPR due to the controller’s failure to conduct a data protection impact assessment. The DPA also reprimanded the processor for the failure to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure the

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case DKN.5131.12.2022 in PL

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

11 June 2026

Authority

Urząd Ochrony Danych Osobowych

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-10137

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case DKN.5131.12.2022 - Poland (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: