Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" IRCCS – €10,000 Fine (Italy, 2024)

€10,000Garante per la protezione dei dati personali17 July 2024Italy
final
Fine

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Italian research hospital was fined for not properly handling personal data in clinical studies. The data protection authority found that the hospital did not obtain adequate consent from participants and failed to conduct necessary assessments before starting the studies. This case stresses the need for transparency and proper consent in medical research.

What happened

The hospital improperly processed personal data in two clinical studies without adequate consent.

Who was affected

Participants in the clinical studies whose data was mishandled were affected.

What the authority found

The authority ruled that the hospital violated several GDPR rules regarding consent and data processing for research.

Why this matters

This case highlights the critical importance of obtaining informed consent and conducting proper assessments in medical research. Research institutions should ensure compliance with data protection laws to avoid penalties.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 12(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 25(GDPR)
Art. 35(GDPR)
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(2) GDPR
Art. 9(2)(j) GDPR
Art. 13(1) GDPR
Art. 13(2)(a) GDPR
Art. 13(3) GDPR
Art. 14(5)(b) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(2) GDPR
Art. 9(2)(j) GDPR
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 14(5)(b) GDPR
Art. 25(GDPR)
Art. 35(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The DPA carried out an ex officio inspection at a research hospital in order to verify compliance with the provisions regarding the processing activities carried out for scientific research purposes in the medical, biomedical and epidemiological fields. Two clinical studies were analysed in terms of the following aspects: principles of lawfulness of processing, transparency to the data subject, retention period, accountability, privacy by design and by default, as well as the obligation to carry out a Data Protection Impact Assessment. The DPA held that the processing of personal data carried out for medical, biomedical and epidemiological research purposes in particular in study #1 and study #2, have been performed in breach of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 9(2)(j) GDPR, Article 35 GDPR, Article 12 GDPR, Article 13 GDPR and Article 14(5)(b) GDPR. The investigation revealed that the consent was collected in an inadequate manner. Such consent was not preceded by a full disclosure of at least its essential elements. In this sense, it was fundamentally flawed from the point of view of specificity and determinacy, according to Article 13 GDPR, and was considered contrary to the principles of transparency and fairness under Article 5(1)(a)GDPR. The DPA reinforced the importance of carrying out a prior DPIA on the processing of personal data for medical research purposes, in response to the controller's claim that it does so only when the study involves a particular type of profiling of patients' data or if there is an impact on their care through automated processing. In this regard, the DPA reaffirmed that the controller limited the preparation of the DPIA to fewer cases than it should have. The failure to carry out the DPIA beforehand in this case was considered a breach under Article 35 GDPR. It was also emphasised that the controller has the duty to issue a specific notice in respect of each individual research project, at least in order to provide information

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" IRCCS in IT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Fine Date

17 July 2024

Authority

Garante per la protezione dei dati personali

Fine Amount

€10,000

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-8332

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" IRCCS - Italy (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: