GDPR Fines & Penalties 2026
Search GDPR fines, penalties, warnings, orders, bans, and investigations across Europe by country, action type, GDPR article, and violation category.
Frequently Asked Questions About GDPR Enforcement
Q:What types of GDPR enforcement actions exist?
GDPR enforcement actions include monetary fines (the most publicised), formal warnings, reprimands, processing bans, data erasure orders, and compliance orders. DPAs can also impose temporary or permanent limitations on data processing. Fines can reach up to EUR 20 million or 4% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher, under Article 83(5) GDPR.
Q:How are GDPR fines calculated by data protection authorities?
DPAs consider factors listed in Article 83(2) GDPR: nature, gravity, and duration of the infringement; intentional or negligent character; actions taken to mitigate damage; degree of responsibility; previous infringements; degree of cooperation; categories of personal data affected; how the infringement became known; and adherence to approved codes of conduct or certification mechanisms.
Q:Can GDPR fines be appealed?
Yes, GDPR fines can be appealed through national courts. Many high-profile fines have been challenged. The appeals process varies by country. Some fines have been reduced on appeal (e.g., British Airways' fine was reduced from GBP 183 million to GBP 20 million), while others have been upheld or even increased.
Browse case links on this page
GDPR Enforcement Actions (93 total)
- Mindemo Oy (previously Heltti Oy) (Finland) – complaint upheld – Oct 2026 | Third-Party Cookies Without Consent
- Court case HelHO:2026:8 (Finland) – court ruling – Sept 2026
- Espoon kaupunki (Finland) – violation found – Sept 2026
- Otavamedia Oy (Finland) – court ruling – Aug 2026 | Reject Harder Than Accept
- Sanoma Media Finland Oy (Finland) – court ruling – Aug 2026 | Cookies Placed Before Consent, Third-Party Cookies Without Consent
- Suomen urheilun eettinen keskus SUEK ry (Finland) – complaint upheld – Aug 2026
- Järvenpää parish (Finland) – court ruling – Apr 2026
- Lepus Asset Management Oy (Finland) – violation found – Mar 2026
- Dun & Bradstreet Finland Oy (Finland) – violation found – Mar 2026
- Suomen Numerokeskus Oy (Finland) – €5K – Mar 2026
- Wolt (Finland) – complaint upheld – Feb 2026
- Court case 391/2024 (Finland) – court ruling – Dec 2025
- Court case KHO:2025:86 (Finland) – court ruling – Dec 2025
- Aktia Pankki Oyj (Finland) – €865K – Oct 2025
- S-Pankki Oyj (Finland) – €1.8M – Sept 2025
- S-Bank Plc (Finland) – €1.8M – Sept 2025
- Court case KHO:2025:51 (Finland) – court ruling – Jun 2025
- Yliopiston Apteekin (Finland) – €1.1M – May 2025
- City of Espoo (Finland) – court ruling – Apr 2025
- Sambla Group (Finland) – €950K – Dec 2024
- Sambla Group Oy (Finland) – €950K – Dec 2024
- Posti Jakelu Oy (Finland) – €2.4M – Nov 2024 | Misleading Banner Messaging, Pre-ticked Consent Boxes
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Finland) – court ruling – Oct 2024
- National Police Board of Finland (Finland) – complaint upheld – Sept 2024
- Finnish Tax Administration (Finland) – complaint upheld – Aug 2024