GDPR Fines & Penalties 2026
Search GDPR fines, penalties, warnings, orders, bans, and investigations across Europe by country, action type, GDPR article, and violation category.
Frequently Asked Questions About GDPR Enforcement
Q:What types of GDPR enforcement actions exist?
GDPR enforcement actions include monetary fines (the most publicised), formal warnings, reprimands, processing bans, data erasure orders, and compliance orders. DPAs can also impose temporary or permanent limitations on data processing. Fines can reach up to EUR 20 million or 4% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher, under Article 83(5) GDPR.
Q:How are GDPR fines calculated by data protection authorities?
DPAs consider factors listed in Article 83(2) GDPR: nature, gravity, and duration of the infringement; intentional or negligent character; actions taken to mitigate damage; degree of responsibility; previous infringements; degree of cooperation; categories of personal data affected; how the infringement became known; and adherence to approved codes of conduct or certification mechanisms.
Q:Can GDPR fines be appealed?
Yes, GDPR fines can be appealed through national courts. Many high-profile fines have been challenged. The appeals process varies by country. Some fines have been reduced on appeal (e.g., British Airways' fine was reduced from GBP 183 million to GBP 20 million), while others have been upheld or even increased.
Browse case links on this page
GDPR Enforcement Actions (5,989 total)
- RECAMBIOS VILLALEGRE S.L. (Spain) – €12K – Nov 2020
- Municipality of Utrechtse Heuvelrug (Netherlands) – court ruling – Nov 2020
- Hoist Finance AB (Netherlands) – court ruling – Nov 2020
- Ryanair DAC (Ireland) – complaint upheld – Nov 2020
- Sbanken ASA (Norway) – dismissed – Nov 2020
- Miguel Ibáñez Bezanilla, S.L. (Spain) – €3K – Nov 2020
- Asociación de Víctimas por Arbitrariedades Judiciales (JAVA) (Spain) – €8K – Nov 2020 | Cookies Placed Before Consent, Misleading Banner Messaging, No Reject Button, Third-Party Cookies Without Consent, Unclear Cookie Information
- Datatilsynet (Norway) – complaint upheld – Nov 2020
- Court case 2 ME 426/20 (Germany) – court ruling – Nov 2020
- Court case 51 O 513/20 (Germany) – court ruling – Nov 2020 | Misleading Banner Messaging
- Student council of the Universiteit van Amsterdam (Netherlands) – court ruling – Nov 2020
- Xfera Moviles S.A. (Spain) – €20K – Nov 2020
- beneficiary of financial aid (data subject) (Austria) – dismissed – Nov 2020
- Google LLC (Netherlands) – court ruling – Nov 2020
- Telefonica Moviles Espana, S.A.U. (Spain) – €75K – Nov 2020
- La Quadrature du Net (France) – court ruling – Nov 2020
- Vodafone România S.A. (Romania) – €4K – Nov 2020
- President of the bar of Eastern Brabant (Netherlands) – court ruling – Nov 2020
- SERGIC SAS (France) – court ruling – Nov 2020
- XFERA MOVILES S.A. (YOIGO) (Spain) – €20K – Nov 2020
- Vodafone España, S.A.U. (Spain) – €30K – Nov 2020
- Raise Marketing SL (Spain) – €2K – Nov 2020
- Dutch government (Netherlands) – court ruling – Nov 2020
- Marriott International, Inc (United Kingdom) – €20.4M – Oct 2020
- Conseguridad SL (Spain) – €50K – Oct 2020