DPA case 10021491 – Complaint Upheld (Italy, 2024)

Complaint Upheld
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali24 April 2024Italy
final
Complaint Upheld

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Italian authority found that the Ministry of Justice unlawfully processed an employee's personal data during a disciplinary investigation. The employee's sex life was not relevant to his job, and the Ministry was told it needed a valid reason to access such information. This case highlights the limits on how employers can investigate their workers.

What happened

The Italian data protection authority upheld a complaint against the Ministry of Justice for unlawfully processing an employee's personal data related to his sex life.

Who was affected

The employee of the Ministry of Justice who was investigated for his personal ads on a dating website.

What the authority found

The authority ruled that the Ministry did not have a valid legal basis to process the employee's personal data as it was not relevant to his job.

Why this matters

This decision sets a precedent that employers cannot investigate personal matters unrelated to work. It serves as a reminder for organizations to respect employee privacy.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 6 GDPR
Art. 9 GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 88 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 9(GDPR)
Art. 88(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 55-sexies d.lgs. 165/2001
Art. 8 l. 300/1970
Art. 10 d.lgs. 276/2003
Art. 2-ter Codice Privacy
Art. 2-sexies Codice Privacy
Art. 113 Codice Privacy

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

An employee (the data subject) of the Ministry of Justice (the controller) offered paid sex on a dating website. His colleagues found his ads, which included pictures, contact information, and a pseudonym. They informed their superiors who, in turn, informed the Ministry. The Ministry carried out a disciplinary investigation and found that the worker committed no disciplinary infringement. The worker filed a complaint with the Italian DPA and claimed that the Ministry unlawfully processed data concerning his sex life and sexual orientation during the investigation. The Ministry claimed that the processing was lawful under Italian labor law and that it was based on a legal obligation[https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:decreto.legislativo:2001;165~art55septies Article 55-sexies d.lgs. 165/2001] for public administrations to investigate potential disciplinary infractions. The Ministry also observed that the data were made publicly available on the Internet by the worker himself. Under Italian labor lawUnder Article 88 GDPR, Member States can provide for more specific rules on the processing of employees' personal data in the context of employment. The authority held that [https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:legge:1970-05-20;300!vig= Article 8 l. 300/1970] and [https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:decreto.legislativo:2003;276 Article 10 d.lgs. 276/2003] were relevant to the case at hand. an employer may only investigate an employee's personal life if the information is relevant to the job. The authority held that the Ministry violated the law because the data subject's sex life was not relevant to his tasks as an employee. The authority also rejected the other arguments from the Ministry. The authority considered it irrelevant that the data were made publicly available on the Internet by the data subject himself and held that the Ministry still needed a legal basis to process them. The authority also observed that the

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 10021491 in IT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

24 April 2024

Authority

Garante per la protezione dei dati personali

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-7954

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 10021491 - Italy (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: