GDPR Fines & Penalties 2026
Search published European fines, warnings, orders and court decisions with a confirmed EU GDPR legal basis. Cases whose applicable law has not yet been confirmed are excluded.
Selected coverage: Europe. Only published cases are included.
126 results · Showing 26–50
A data subject (an employee)
An unnamed telecom provider
DPA case 162/2024
X versus Y
DPA case 133/2024
Cumuleo.be
DPA case 101/2024
DPA case 99/2024
DPA case 98/2024
DPA case 97/2024
DPA case 93/2024
DPA case 87/2024
DPA case 86/2024
DPA case 70/2024
DPA case 71/2024
DPA case 63/2024
DPA case 49/2024
DPA case 50/2024
DPA case 48/2024
DPA case 40/2024
DPA case 35/2024
DPA case 32/2024
DPA case 26/2024
DPA case DOS-2023-02597
Black Tiger Belgium
Frequently Asked Questions About GDPR Enforcement
Q:What types of GDPR enforcement actions exist?
GDPR enforcement actions include monetary fines (the most publicised), formal warnings, reprimands, processing bans, data erasure orders, and compliance orders. DPAs can also impose temporary or permanent limitations on data processing. Fines can reach up to EUR 20 million or 4% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher, under Article 83(5) GDPR.
Q:How are GDPR fines calculated by data protection authorities?
DPAs consider factors listed in Article 83(2) GDPR: nature, gravity, and duration of the infringement; intentional or negligent character; actions taken to mitigate damage; degree of responsibility; previous infringements; degree of cooperation; categories of personal data affected; how the infringement became known; and adherence to approved codes of conduct or certification mechanisms.
Q:Can GDPR fines be appealed?
Yes, GDPR fines can be appealed through national courts. Many high-profile fines have been challenged. The appeals process varies by country. Some fines have been reduced on appeal (e.g., British Airways' fine was reduced from GBP 183 million to GBP 20 million), while others have been upheld or even increased.
Browse case links on this page
GDPR Enforcement Actions (126 total)
- A data subject (an employee) (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Jan 2025
- An unnamed telecom provider (Belgium) – court ruling – Jan 2025
- DPA case 162/2024 (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Dec 2024
- X versus Y (Belgium) – €5K – Nov 2024
- DPA case 133/2024 (Belgium) – dismissed – Oct 2024
- Cumuleo.be (Belgium) – dismissed – Aug 2024
- DPA case 101/2024 (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Jul 2024
- DPA case 99/2024 (Belgium) – dismissed – Jul 2024
- DPA case 98/2024 (Belgium) – dismissed – Jul 2024
- DPA case 97/2024 (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Jul 2024
- DPA case 93/2024 (Belgium) – order – Jun 2024
- DPA case 87/2024 (Belgium) – €172K – Jun 2024
- DPA case 86/2024 (Belgium) – complaint upheld – May 2024
- DPA case 70/2024 (Belgium) – complaint upheld – May 2024
- DPA case 71/2024 (Belgium) – complaint upheld – May 2024
- DPA case 63/2024 (Belgium) – dismissed – Apr 2024
- DPA case 49/2024 (Belgium) – dismissed – Mar 2024
- DPA case 50/2024 (Belgium) – dismissed – Mar 2024
- DPA case 48/2024 (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Mar 2024
- DPA case 40/2024 (Belgium) – order – Feb 2024
- DPA case 35/2024 (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Feb 2024
- DPA case 32/2024 (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Feb 2024
- DPA case 26/2024 (Belgium) – dismissed – Feb 2024
- DPA case DOS-2023-02597 (Belgium) – violation found – Jan 2024
- Black Tiger Belgium (Belgium) – €175K – Jan 2024