Vodafone España, S.A.U. – €120,000 Fine (Spain, 2021)

€120,000Agencia Española de Protección de Datos10 February 2021Spain
final
Fine

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Vodafone España kept sending billing emails to a person who had stopped being their customer. This happened even after the person asked them to stop and complained to the Spanish data protection authority. The case highlights the importance of respecting people's wishes regarding their personal information.

What happened

Vodafone España sent email communications to a former customer without their consent.

Who was affected

A former customer of Vodafone España who requested to stop receiving emails.

What the authority found

The Spanish data protection authority ruled that Vodafone processed the person's personal data without a legal basis, violating GDPR rules.

Why this matters

This case shows that companies must take customer requests seriously and ensure they stop using personal data when asked. Small businesses should review their email practices to avoid similar issues.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 6(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(11) GDPR
Art. 6(1) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

National Law Articles

AI-identified

Art. 6 LOPDGDD
Source verified 6 March 2026
articles corrected
national law identified
amount discrepancy
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The claimant complained to the Spanish DPA (AEPD) that he/she was still receiving invoicing emails from Vodafone España, S.A.U. despite no longer being a client. The claimant had previously complained about receiving email communications from Vodafone and the DPA had also previously sanctioned Vodafone twice for breaches of Article 6(1) GDPR regarding these same facts ([https://lopdcumplimiento.es/biblioteca/RGPD/resoluciones/AEPD%202020-01-13%20PS-00278-2019%20sancion%20a%20Vodafone%20por%20incumplimiento%20licitud%20del%20tratamiento%20al%20enviar%20emails%20tras%20solicitar%20supresion%20datos.pdf PS/00278/2019] and [https://www.aepd.es/es/documento/ps-00186-2020.pdf PS/00186/2020]). Vodafone claimed that there was an error in the system that "hooked" the claimant's email address, however, this was supposedly fixed subsequent to the first two sanctions imposed by the Spanish DPA. After receiving yet another communications from Vodafone (despite claims that the error was fixed), the claimant asked Vodafone to delete all the information it had concerning him/her from their system and to stop sending email communications to him/her. The claimant also complained to the DPA a final time. Does the continuous sending of communications to a data subject that has already complained about these communications twice constitute a violation of Article 6(1) GDPR that requires a fine to be imposed? The Spanish DPA (AEPD) held that Vodafone was sending the data subject email communications without his/her consent. The DPA first outlined Article 6(1)(a) and (b) GDPR, Articles 4(11) GDPR on consent, as well as Article 6 of the Spanish Data Protection Law (LOPDGDD) on consent. The DPA therefore held that there was a clear violation of Article 6 GDPR as Vodafone processed the data subject's personal data without a legal basis. The data subject continued to receive email communications despite no longer being a client and despite having complained twice to the Spanish DPA on the

Related Enforcement Actions (20)

Other enforcement actions involving Vodafone España, S.A.U. in ES

Current
Feb 2021

Fine

€120K

Details

Fine Date

10 February 2021

Authority

Agencia Española de Protección de Datos

Fine Amount

€120,000

Enforcement Tracker ID

ETid-214

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-3154

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Vodafone España, S.A.U. - Spain (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: