GDPR Fines & Penalties 2026
Search published European fines, warnings, orders and court decisions with a confirmed EU GDPR legal basis. Cases whose applicable law has not yet been confirmed are excluded.
Selected coverage: Europe. Only published cases are included.
46 results · Showing 26–46
DPA case 7587/163/20
DPA case 3895/83/22
DPA case 7285/183/18
Oy BMW Suomi Ab
Otavamedia Oy
Police University College
Medical clinic
Lääkäriklinikka Estetic Oy
Google LLC
DPA case 3592/152/2019
DPA case 6132/151/19
Magazine publisher
ParkkiPate Oy
DPA case 9209/157/2019
Helsingin kaupunki (City of Helsinki)
DPA case 6652/154/19
DPA case 3846/157/2019
DPA case 3425/157/2019
Google LLC
Taksi Helsinki
Posti Group Oyj
Frequently Asked Questions About GDPR Enforcement
Q:What types of GDPR enforcement actions exist?
GDPR enforcement actions include monetary fines (the most publicised), formal warnings, reprimands, processing bans, data erasure orders, and compliance orders. DPAs can also impose temporary or permanent limitations on data processing. Fines can reach up to EUR 20 million or 4% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher, under Article 83(5) GDPR.
Q:How are GDPR fines calculated by data protection authorities?
DPAs consider factors listed in Article 83(2) GDPR: nature, gravity, and duration of the infringement; intentional or negligent character; actions taken to mitigate damage; degree of responsibility; previous infringements; degree of cooperation; categories of personal data affected; how the infringement became known; and adherence to approved codes of conduct or certification mechanisms.
Q:Can GDPR fines be appealed?
Yes, GDPR fines can be appealed through national courts. Many high-profile fines have been challenged. The appeals process varies by country. Some fines have been reduced on appeal (e.g., British Airways' fine was reduced from GBP 183 million to GBP 20 million), while others have been upheld or even increased.
Browse case links on this page
GDPR Enforcement Actions (46 total)
- DPA case 7587/163/20 (Finland) – complaint upheld – Jul 2022
- DPA case 3895/83/22 (Finland) – violation found – Jun 2022
- DPA case 7285/183/18 (Finland) – complaint upheld – Jun 2022
- Oy BMW Suomi Ab (Finland) – dismissed – Jun 2022
- Otavamedia Oy (Finland) – €85K – May 2022
- Police University College (Finland) – complaint upheld – May 2022
- Medical clinic (Finland) – €5K – Dec 2021
- Lääkäriklinikka Estetic Oy (Finland) – €5K – Dec 2021
- Google LLC (Finland) – court ruling – Dec 2021
- DPA case 3592/152/2019 (Finland) – complaint upheld – Oct 2021
- DPA case 6132/151/19 (Finland) – complaint upheld – Oct 2021
- Magazine publisher (Finland) – €9K – Jun 2021
- ParkkiPate Oy (Finland) – €75K – Apr 2021
- DPA case 9209/157/2019 (Finland) – complaint upheld – Jan 2021
- Helsingin kaupunki (City of Helsinki) (Finland) – complaint upheld – Jan 2021
- DPA case 6652/154/19 (Finland) – dismissed – Aug 2020
- DPA case 3846/157/2019 (Finland) – complaint upheld – Jul 2020
- DPA case 3425/157/2019 (Finland) – complaint upheld – Jul 2020
- Google LLC (Finland) – complaint upheld – Jun 2020
- Taksi Helsinki (Finland) – €72K – May 2020
- Posti Group Oyj (Finland) – €100K – May 2020